Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32651885›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2021

Bevacizumab in recurrent ovarian cancer: could it be particularly effective in patients with clear cell carcinoma?

A Gallego, J Ramon-Patino, J Brenes, M Mendiola, A Berjon, G Casado, B Castelo, E Espinosa, A Hernandez, D Hardisson and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A Gallego *Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
J Ramon-Patino *Translational Oncology Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
J BrenesDepartment of Medical Oncology, Instituto Catalán de Oncología, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
M MendiolaMolecular Pathology and Therapeutic Targets Group, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
A BerjonMolecular Pathology and Therapeutic Targets Group, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
G CasadoDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
B CasteloDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
E EspinosaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
A HernandezFaculty of Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
D HardissonMolecular Pathology and Therapeutic Targets Group, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
J FeliuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
A RedondoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain. andres.redondos@uam.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7257-5642
Hospital Universitario La Paz · ESInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTreatment of recurrent ovarian carcinoma is a challenge, particularly for the clear cell (CCC) subtype. However, there is a preclinical rationale that these patients could achieve a benefit from antiangiogenic therapy. To assess this hypothesis, we used the growth modulation index (GMI), which represents an intrapatient comparison of two successive progression-free survival (PFS).

methodsWe conducted a retrospective real-world study performed on 34 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, treated with bevacizumab-containing regimens from January 2009 to December 2017. The primary endpoint was GMI. An established cut-off > 1.33 was defined as a sign of drug activity.

results73.5% of patients had high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), and 17.7% had CCC; 70.6% of patients received carboplatin/gemcitabine/bevacizumab, and 29.4% received weekly paclitaxel/bevacizumab. According to histological subtype, the overall response rate and median PFS were 52% and 14 months for HGSOC and 83.3% and 20 months for CCC, respectively. The overall population median GMI was 0.99; it was 0.95 and 2.36 for HGSOC and CCC, respectively. CCC subtype was significantly correlated with GMI > 1.33 (odds ratio 41.67; 95% confidence interval 3.6-486.94; p = .03).

conclusionAdding bevacizumab to chemotherapy in recurrent CCC is associated with a remarkable benefit in this cohort. The efficacy of antiangiogenic drugs in CCC warrants further prospective evaluation.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, Clear CellAdultAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCarboplatinConfidence IntervalsCystadenocarcinoma, SerousDeoxycytidineFemaleGemcitabineHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBevacizumabCarboplatinDeoxycytidineGemcitabinePaclitaxelBevacizumabClear cell carcinomaGrowth modulation indexRecurrent ovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID32651885
OpenAlexW3040817408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.