ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
Sulfate removal from mine-impacted water by electrocoagulation: statistical study, factorial design, and kinetics.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This work aimed to remove sulfate and acidity from mine-impacted water (MIW) via electrocoagulation (EC), a technique which stands as an advanced alternative to chemical coagulation in pollutant removal from wastewaters. The multiple electrochemical reactions occurring in the aluminum anode and the stainless steel cathode surfaces can form unstable flakes of metal hydroxysulfate complexes, causing coagulation, flocculation, and floatation; or, adsorption of sulfate on sorbents originated from the electrochemical process can occur, depending on pH value. Batch experiments in the continuous mode of exposition using different current densities (35, 50, and 65 A m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.