ReviewInternational orthopaedics2021
The Ponseti method of treatment for neuromuscular and syndromic (non-idiopathic) clubfeet: evaluation of a programme-based approach at a mean follow-up of 5.8 years.
Review in International orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of the ponseti method in treating neurogenic clubfoot: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Ponseti Method of Treatment for Idiopathic and Nonidiopathic Clubfoot: A 4 year follow-up study.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Association of Polymorphism in Locus of rs274503 (Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers · 2024Article
- Comparing patient-reported outcomes of the Oxford Ankle and Foot Questionnaire in children with clubfoot from two different geographic and cultural environments: a cohort study in India and Canada.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- An investigation of maternal psychological status of children with congenital talipes equinovarus treated with the Ponseti method.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Common Errors in the Management of Idiopathic Clubfeet Using the Ponseti Method: A Review of the Literature.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Effectiveness of Ponseti technique in management of arthrogrypotic clubfeet - a prospective study.International journal of burns and trauma · 2023Article
- Ponseti Casting vs. Soft Tissue Release for the Initial Treatment of Non-idiopathic Clubfoot.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo analyse the results of the Ponseti method in the treatment of non-idiopathic clubfeet and compare them with idiopathic clubfeet in a programme-based setting using a standardized protocol
methodsWe reviewed two groups of 782 children treated prospectively in our programme-based Clubfoot Clinic: group I comprised of 89 patients (146 feet) with non-idiopathic clubfoot and group II comprised of 693 patients (1032 feet) with idiopathic clubfoot. Both groups were compared on the basis of patient demographics, number of casts, tenotomy rate, success rate, rate of recurrences, and the need for additional secondary procedures.
resultsNon-idiopathic clubfeet had a higher incidence of bilateral involvement (p = 0.0093) and affected both males and females equally (p = 0.002) as compared with idiopathic clubfeet. Non-idiopathic clubfeet (group I) required significantly more casts (6.75 ± 4.2) compared with idiopathic clubfeet (4.23 ± 4.14), had a higher rate of Achilles tenotomy (90.4% vs 75%, p < 0.0001), and had a lower initial correction rate compared with idiopathic clubfeet (92.5% vs 100%, p < 0.0001). There was a significant difference in the recurrence rates between the two groups, as 42.5% of non-idiopathic feet (38 patients) relapsed compared with 10.2% (71 patients) in the idiopathic group (p < 0.0001). Most recurrences in group I were amenable to re-casting, with only nine patients (14 non-idiopathic clubfeet) requiring extensive soft tissue releases. The final success rate in the non-idiopathic group at a mean follow-up of 5.8 years (2-8 years) was 87.7%.
conclusionsWe recommend the use of the Ponseti method as an effective treatment for non-idiopathic clubfeet associated with neuromuscular and syndromic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32651710What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.