Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32651687›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2021

Using working memory performance to predict mathematics performance 2 years on.

Katie Allen, David Giofrè, Steve Higgins, John Adams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katie AllenSchool of Education, University of Durham, Durham, UK. katie.allen@durham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1145-8642
David GiofrèDipartimento di Scienze della Formazione (DISFOR), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7887-5286
Steve HigginsSchool of Education, University of Durham, Durham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0314-4846
John AdamsDepartment of Psychology, University of Durham, Durham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-615X

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council (GB) ES/P000762/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of previous studies have used working memory components to predict mathematical performance in a variety of ways; however, there is no consideration of the contributions of the subcomponents of visuospatial working memory to this prediction. In this paper we conducted a 2-year follow-up to the data presented in Allen et al. (Q J Exp Psychol 73(2):239-248, 2020b) to ascertain how these subcomponents of visuospatial working memory related to later mathematical performance. 159 children (M age = 115.48 months) completed the maths test for this second wave of the study. Results show a shift from spatial-simultaneous influence to spatial-sequential influence, whilst verbal involvement remained relatively stable. Results are discussed in terms of their potential for education and future research.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermAcademic PerformanceChildCognitionEducational StatusHumansMathematicsPsychology, EducationalSpatial ProcessingTask Performance and AnalysisVerbal Behavior

Identifiers

PMID32651687
PMCPMC8289789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.