Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32651674›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2020

Performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients.

Julie Helms, François Severac, Hamid Merdji, Raphaël Clere-Jehl, Bruno François, Emmanuelle Mercier, Jean-Pierre Quenot, Ferhat Meziani, CRICS TRIGGERSEP Group (Clinical Research in Intensive Care and Sepsis Trial Group for Global Evaluation and Research in Sepsis)

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02391792 (Membrane Shedding During Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02391792 unknown statusnot on this map

Membrane Shedding During Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Pathophysiological and Clinical Relevance

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceRan2013 to 2020Enrolled300ConditionsSevere Sepsis and Septic Shock
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of Anticoagulant Versus Non-Anticoagulant Therapy on Mortality of Sepsis-Induced Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Differential Diagnosis of Thromobocytopenia.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025
    Review
  9. [Nomogram and machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality in sepsis patients with deep vein thrombosis].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. The diagnosis of DIC: a current overview.Frontiers in medicine · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie HelmsHôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1, Place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
François SeveracGroupe Méthode en Recherche Clinique, Service de Santé Publique, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Hamid MerdjiHôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1, Place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Raphaël Clere-JehlHôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1, Place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Bruno FrançoisInserm CIC1435 & UMR1092, CHU Dupuytren, Limoges, France.
Emmanuelle MercierService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bretonneau, CRICS-TRIGGERSEP Network, Tours, France.
Jean-Pierre QuenotService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Ferhat MezianiHôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1, Place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg Cedex, France. ferhat.meziani@chru-strasbourg.fr.
CRICS TRIGGERSEP Group (Clinical Research in Intensive Care and Sepsis Trial Group for Global Evaluation and Research in Sepsis)
Inserm · FRLaboratoire des Sciences de l'Ingénieur, de l'Informatique et de l'Imagerie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no gold standard to diagnose septic shock-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The objective of our multicenter prospective study was to assess the performances of the different major scoring systems in terms of mortality prediction and DIC diagnosis. The JAAM-DIC 2016 score, the ISTH overt-DIC 2001 score, the associations of sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) score with JAAM-DIC 2016 or ISTH overt-DIC scores were tested in patients within 12 h of their admission in ICU for septic shock (day 1) and at day 2.

results582 patients were enrolled in the study. 182/567 (32.1%) were diagnosed with DIC according to ISTH overt-DIC score, and 193/561 (34.4%) according to JAAM-DIC score; 486/577 patients (84.2%) were diagnosed with a coagulopathy according to SIC score. A moderate concordance was observed between ISTH overt-DIC and JAAM-DIC [κ = 0.67 (0.60, 0.73), p < 0.001]. The delay of positivity of the scores for early DIC patients was not different between JAAM-DIC and ISTH overt-DIC scores. Although it was positive earlier, SIC score had worse diagnosis specificity, as 84.2% of the patients with septic shock were diagnosed with "coagulopathy". The specificity of SIC score alone to predict mortality was very low [0.18 (0.15; 0.22)], compared to the ones of JAAM-DIC score [0.71 (0.67; 0.75)], and of ISTH overt-DIC score [0.76 (0.72; 0.80)], p < 0.001. The sensitivity of SIC score to predict mortality was 0.95 [0.89; 0.98], and the ones of JAAM-DIC score and ISTH overt-DIC score were 0.61 [0.50; 0.70] and 0.68 [0.58; 0.77], respectively. There was no benefit in sensitivity and specificity in combining SIC score to JAAM-DIC score or to ISTH overt-DIC score, compared to JAAM-DIC score or ISTH overt-DIC score alone.

conclusionsOur data suggest that the added value of SIC score alone or combined with other scores is limited, and that both JAAM-DIC score and ISTH overt-DIC score can be used in septic shock patients. Trial registration clinicaltrial; Trial registration number: NCT02391792; Date of registration: 18/03/2015; URL of trial registry record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02391792?term=meziani&draw=4&rank=1.

Indexed as

CoagulopathyDICDisseminated intravascular coagulationSepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID32651674
PMCPMC7352012
OpenAlexW3041030856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.