ArticleAnnals of intensive care2020
Performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients.
Article in Annals of intensive care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02391792 (Membrane Shedding During Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Membrane Shedding During Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Pathophysiological and Clinical Relevance
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Effect of Anticoagulant Versus Non-Anticoagulant Therapy on Mortality of Sepsis-Induced Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisPooled it
- Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model to Predict Mortality in Patients With Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy: Multicenter Cohort Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Early Prediction of Sepsis-Related Coagulopathy: A Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Scoring Systems in the Emergency Department.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning for early prediction of sepsis-induced coagulopathy: a multicenter retrospective development and validation study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Article
- Explainable machine learning model for predicting short-term outcomes in sepsis- induced coagulopathy.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- The Differential Diagnosis of Thromobocytopenia.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Review
- [Nomogram and machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality in sepsis patients with deep vein thrombosis].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025Article
- Incidence of Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy (INSIC) Trial: Study Protocol of a Combined Retrospective and Prospective, Multicenter, International, Cross-Sectional, Longitudinal, and Epidemiological Observational Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The Procoagulant and Fibrinolytic Balance of Extracellular Vesicles Predicts Mortality in Septic Shock Patients.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2025Article
- Plasma H3.1 nucleosomes as biomarkers of infection, inflammation and organ failure.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Observational
- Article
- The diagnosis of DIC: a current overview.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Impending sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) is associated with increased disease severity in SIC-negative patients: a secondary analysis of a prospective exploratory study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) in the management of sepsis.Annals of intensive care · 2024Review
- A machine learning model for early and accurate prediction of overt disseminated intravascular coagulation before its progression to an overt stage.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
- Persistent high sepsis-induced coagulopathy and sequential organ failure assessment scores can predict the 28-day mortality of patients with sepsis: A prospective study.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Comparison of five different disseminated intravascular coagulation criteria in predicting mortality in patients with sepsis.PloS one · 2024Observational
- Machine learning models can predict cancer-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation in critically ill colorectal cancer patients.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is no gold standard to diagnose septic shock-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The objective of our multicenter prospective study was to assess the performances of the different major scoring systems in terms of mortality prediction and DIC diagnosis. The JAAM-DIC 2016 score, the ISTH overt-DIC 2001 score, the associations of sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) score with JAAM-DIC 2016 or ISTH overt-DIC scores were tested in patients within 12 h of their admission in ICU for septic shock (day 1) and at day 2.
results582 patients were enrolled in the study. 182/567 (32.1%) were diagnosed with DIC according to ISTH overt-DIC score, and 193/561 (34.4%) according to JAAM-DIC score; 486/577 patients (84.2%) were diagnosed with a coagulopathy according to SIC score. A moderate concordance was observed between ISTH overt-DIC and JAAM-DIC [κ = 0.67 (0.60, 0.73), p < 0.001]. The delay of positivity of the scores for early DIC patients was not different between JAAM-DIC and ISTH overt-DIC scores. Although it was positive earlier, SIC score had worse diagnosis specificity, as 84.2% of the patients with septic shock were diagnosed with "coagulopathy". The specificity of SIC score alone to predict mortality was very low [0.18 (0.15; 0.22)], compared to the ones of JAAM-DIC score [0.71 (0.67; 0.75)], and of ISTH overt-DIC score [0.76 (0.72; 0.80)], p < 0.001. The sensitivity of SIC score to predict mortality was 0.95 [0.89; 0.98], and the ones of JAAM-DIC score and ISTH overt-DIC score were 0.61 [0.50; 0.70] and 0.68 [0.58; 0.77], respectively. There was no benefit in sensitivity and specificity in combining SIC score to JAAM-DIC score or to ISTH overt-DIC score, compared to JAAM-DIC score or ISTH overt-DIC score alone.
conclusionsOur data suggest that the added value of SIC score alone or combined with other scores is limited, and that both JAAM-DIC score and ISTH overt-DIC score can be used in septic shock patients. Trial registration clinicaltrial; Trial registration number: NCT02391792; Date of registration: 18/03/2015; URL of trial registry record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02391792?term=meziani&draw=4&rank=1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.