Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32651644›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2021

Comparison between isolated and associated with codeine acetaminophen in pain control of acute apical abscess: a randomized clinical trial.

Paula Barcellos da Silva, Aline Teixeira Mendes, Maria Beatriz Ferreira Cardoso, Ricardo Abreu da Rosa, Angela Longo do Nascimento, Jefferson Ricardo Pereira, Marcus Vinícius Reis Só

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paula Barcellos da SilvaConservative Dentistry Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Aline Teixeira MendesConservative Dentistry Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Maria Beatriz Ferreira CardosoPharmacology Department, Basic Health Sciences Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Ricardo Abreu da RosaConservative Dentistry Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Angela Longo do NascimentoConservative Dentistry Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Jefferson Ricardo PereiraDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Southern Santa Catarina, Tubarão, SC, Brazil.
Marcus Vinícius Reis SóConservative Dentistry Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. endo-so@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1393-5900
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidade do Sul de Santa Catarina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe study aimed to compare the acetaminophen administration efficacy or its combination with codeine for pain control in acute apical abscesses cases. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty-nine patients who sought emergency treatment in the Faculty of Dentistry of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul were included, all of them with acute apical abscess diagnosis. These patients were divided into two groups: acetaminophen group-prescription of acetaminophen (1000 mg) and acetaminophen-codeine group-prescription of acetaminophen (1000 mg) + codeine (30 mg), both with oral intake every 6 h for 3 days. The pain scores were recorded by the patients on their own at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after finishing clinical assistance, by filling a pain evolution journal, containing a visual analogue scale (VAS). Student t test was conducted to investigate different mean ages between groups 1 and 2. A comparison of weight and means of initial pain scores between groups was carried out using the Mann-Whitney U test. Chi-square test was performed to compare gender, affected tooth, education, initial swelling, and frequency of adverse effect between test and control groups. Mann-Whitney U test was applied to compare groups in the same period. Friedman's test was used to compare results from the same group over time.

resultsBoth groups showed score reduction over time (P < 0.05). Paracetamol-codeine group showed significant pain score reduction at 48 h registers when compared to baseline and at 6 h scores (P < 0.05). Further, pain scores at 72 h were significantly lower, when compared to the baseline, at 6 h, and at 12 h scores (P < 0.05). Acetaminophen group showed significant pain score reduction observed at 72 h, when compared to the baseline and at 6 h scores (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in pain score reduction over time between groups (P > 0.05). There was no difference between the groups regarding the frequency of adverse reactions (P > 0.05).

conclusionBoth medications were effective for pain control in acute apical abscess cases. The findings might have inferred in pain control of acute apical abscess associated pain in patients who used an antibiotic drug. External validity of the findings for acute apical abscess cases with no need for an antibiotic prescription is uncertain. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This paper suggests acetaminophen 1000 mg can be used for pain control in the treatment of acute apical abscess associated with systemic manifestation.

Indexed as

AcetaminophenAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAbscessAnalgesics, OpioidCodeineDouble-Blind MethodDrug CombinationsHumansPainPostoperative PainAcetaminophenAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidCodeineDrug CombinationsAcetaminophenAnalgesiaCodeineEndodonticsPeriapical abscessVisual analog scale

Identifiers

PMID32651644
OpenAlexW3041622615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.