Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32651401›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Generalizable deep temporal models for predicting episodes of sudden hypotension in critically ill patients: a personalized approach.

Brandon Chan, Brian Chen, Alireza Sedghi, Philip Laird, David Maslove, Parvin Mousavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brandon ChanSchool of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Brian ChenSchool of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Alireza SedghiSchool of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Philip LairdDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, K7L 2V7, Canada.
David MasloveSchool of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Parvin MousaviSchool of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, K7L 3N6, Canada. pmousavi@cs.queensu.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vast quantities of data generated and collected in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) have given rise to large retrospective datasets that are frequently used for observational studies. The temporal nature and fine granularity of much of the data collected in the ICU enable the pursuit of predictive modeling. In particular, forecasting acute hypotensive episodes (AHE) in intensive care patients has been of interest to researchers in critical care medicine. Given an advance warning of an AHE, care providers may be prompted to search for evolving disease processes and help mitigate negative clinical outcomes. However, the conventionally adopted definition of an AHE does not account for inter-patient variability and is restrictive. To reflect the wider trend of global clinical and research efforts in precision medicine, we introduce a patient-specific definition of AHE in this study and propose deep learning based models to predict this novel definition of AHE in data from multiple independent institutions. We provide extensive evaluation of the models by studying their accuracies in detecting patient-specific AHEs with lead-times ranging from 10 min to 1 hour before the onset of the event. The resulting models achieve AUROC values ranging from 0.57-0.87 depending on the lead time of the prediction. We demonstrate the generalizability and robustness of our approach through the use of independent multi-institutional data.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineCritical CareCritical IllnessDeep LearningHumansHypotensionIntensive Care UnitsModels, TheoreticalRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32651401
PMCPMC7351714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.