Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32651398›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Group structure and kinship in beluga whale societies.

Greg O'Corry-Crowe, Robert Suydam, Lori Quakenbush, Thomas G Smith, Christian Lydersen, Kit M Kovacs, Jack Orr, Lois Harwood, Dennis Litovka, Tatiana Ferrer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Imitation of Novel Intransitive Body Actions in a Beluga Whale (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Greg O'Corry-CroweHarbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, Florida Atlantic University, 5600 US. 1 North, Fort Pierce, FL, 34946, USA. gocorryc@fau.edu.
Robert SuydamNorth Slope Borough Department of Wildlife Management, 1274 Agvik Str., Utqiagvik, AK, 99723, USA.
Lori QuakenbushAlaska Department of Fish and Game, 1300 College Road, Fairbanks, AK, 99701, USA.
Thomas G SmithEco Marine Corporation, 5694 Camp Comfort Road, Beaulac-Garthby, QC, G0Y 1B0, Canada.
Christian LydersenNorwegian Polar Institute, Framsenteret, Hjalmar Johansens Gate 14, 9296, Tromsø, Norway.
Kit M KovacsNorwegian Polar Institute, Framsenteret, Hjalmar Johansens Gate 14, 9296, Tromsø, Norway.
Jack OrrFisheries and Oceans Canada, 501 University Crescent, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N6, Canada.
Lois HarwoodFisheries and Oceans, Canada, 301-5204 50th Ave., Yellowknife, NT, X1A 1E2, Canada.
Dennis LitovkaOffice of the Governor and Government of the Chukotka Autonomous Region, Str. Bering 20, Anadyr, 689000, Russia.
Tatiana FerrerHarbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, Florida Atlantic University, 5600 US. 1 North, Fort Pierce, FL, 34946, USA.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada · CAFlorida Atlantic University · USThe FRAM Centre · NOAlaska Department of Fish and Game · USNorth Slope Borough · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary explanations for mammalian sociality typically center on inclusive-fitness benefits of associating and cooperating with close kin, or close maternal kin as in some whale societies, including killer and sperm whales. Their matrilineal structure has strongly influenced the thinking about social structure in less well-studied cetaceans, including beluga whales. In a cross-sectional study of group structure and kinship we found that belugas formed a limited number of distinct group types, consistently observed across populations and habitats. Certain behaviours were associated with group type, but group membership was often dynamic. MtDNA-microsatellite profiling combined with relatedness and network analysis revealed, contrary to predictions, that most social groupings were not predominantly organized around close maternal relatives. They comprised both kin and non-kin, many group members were paternal rather than maternal relatives, and unrelated adult males often traveled together. The evolutionary mechanisms that shape beluga societies are likely complex; fitness benefits may be achieved through reciprocity, mutualism and kin selection. At the largest scales these societies are communities comprising all ages and both sexes where multiple social learning pathways involving kin and non-kin can foster the emergence of cultures. We explore the implications of these findings for species management and the evolution of menopause.

Identifiers

PMID32651398
PMCPMC7351962
OpenAlexW3041411185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.