Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32651397›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Structure-based designing efficient peptides based on p53 binding site residues to disrupt p53-MDM2/X interaction.

Nasim Rasafar, Abolfazl Barzegar, Elnaz Mehdizadeh Aghdam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nasim RasafarResearch Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Abolfazl BarzegarResearch Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran. barzegar@tabrizu.ac.ir.
Elnaz Mehdizadeh AghdamMolecular Medicine Research Center, Biomedicine Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. mehdizadehe@tbzmed.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8631-1509
University of Tabriz · IRTabriz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MDM2 and MDMX are known as overexpressed oncoproteins in several wild-type p53 cancer cells. The development of potent and dual antagonist peptides for p53-MDM2/X is a continuous challenge. In this study, we intended to investigate the pivotal structural points respecting the development of potent and dual inhibitors of MDM2/X. Correspondingly, MD simulation was performed on the experimentally confirmed peptides, comprising p53, pDI, pDIQ, PMI, and computationally screened mutant pDI and pDIQ. A follow-up secondary structure analysis showed the last three C-terminal residues provide the helicity reservation of peptides bound to MDM2/X. Furthermore, a delicate residue-residue examination displayed Met 11 and Ser12 in the modified peptides contribute significantly to dual inhibition of MDM2/X. Additionally, the peptides_MDM2/X complexes' ΔG

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBinding SitesCell Cycle ProteinsComputational BiologyHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationNeoplasmsPeptidesProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein Structure, SecondaryProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Tumor Suppressor Protein p53Cell Cycle ProteinsMDM2 protein, humanMDM4 protein, humanPeptidesProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID32651397
PMCPMC7351717
OpenAlexW3041013154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.