Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32651280›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Working memory capacity predicts individual differences in social-distancing compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.

Weizhen Xie, Stephen Campbell, Weiwei Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Association of Cerebrovascular Disease with Adverse Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients: A Meta-Analysis Based on Adjusted Effect Estimates.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The role of the parahippocampal cortex in memory consolidation for scenes.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Compliance with Health Recommendations and Vaccine Hesitancy During the COVID Pandemic in Nine Countries.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Article
  11. The Relation Between Attention and Memory.Annual review of psychology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effortfulness of visual working memory: Gauged by physical exertion.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Weizhen XieNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; weizhen.xie@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0003-4655-6496
Stephen CampbellDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521.
Weiwei ZhangDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521.
University of California, Riverside · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

A Neurocognitive Mechanism for Precision of Visual Working Memory RepresentationsR01MH117132 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI ZHANG, WEIWEI · 2018 to 2022
$1.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noncompliance with social distancing during the early stage of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses a great challenge to the public health system. These noncompliance behaviors partly reflect people's concerns for the inherent costs of social distancing while discounting its public health benefits. We propose that this oversight may be associated with the limitation in one's mental capacity to simultaneously retain multiple pieces of information in working memory (WM) for rational decision making that leads to social-distancing compliance. We tested this hypothesis in 850 United States residents during the first 2 wk following the presidential declaration of national emergency because of the COVID-19 pandemic. We found that participants' social-distancing compliance at this initial stage could be predicted by individual differences in WM capacity, partly due to increased awareness of benefits over costs of social distancing among higher WM capacity individuals. Critically, the unique contribution of WM capacity to the individual differences in social-distancing compliance could not be explained by other psychological and socioeconomic factors (e.g., moods, personality, education, and income levels). Furthermore, the critical role of WM capacity in social-distancing compliance can be generalized to the compliance with another set of rules for social interactions, namely the fairness norm, in Western cultures. Collectively, our data reveal contributions of a core cognitive process underlying social-distancing compliance during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting a potential cognitive venue for developing strategies to mitigate a public health crisis.

Indexed as

Decision MakingIndividualityInterpersonal RelationsPhysical DistancingBetacoronavirusCognitionCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansMemory, Short-TermPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2United StatesCOVID-19individual differencessocial distancingsocial normworking memory

Identifiers

PMID32651280
PMCPMC7395511
OpenAlexW3040812576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.