Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32651178›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based mental health2020

Explanatory style in youth self-harm: an Indian qualitative study to inform intervention design.

Shilpa Aggarwal, George Patton, Deepika Bahl, Nilesh Shah, Michael Berk, Vikram Patel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based mental health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Shilpa AggarwalDepartment of Mental Health and Non-Communicable Diseases, Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, Delhi, India shilpazq@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8590-0846
George PattonDepartment of Adolescent Health, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Deepika BahlDepartment of Mental Health and Non-Communicable Diseases, Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Nilesh ShahDepartment of Psychiatry, Sion Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Michael BerkDepartment of Psychiatry, Deakin University School of Medicine, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Vikram PatelDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Public Health Foundation of India · INDeakin University · AUHarvard University · USLokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital and Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College · INMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AU

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CPHE/16/1/502664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are very few studies that have examined the effectiveness of psychological interventions (PIs) that have been developed and tested in high-income countries to reduce self-harm in low and middle-income countries.

objectiveTo evaluate the perspectives and explanatory styles of youth with self-harm and their caregivers to inform the design of an evidence based PI in a non-Western cultural setting. An additional objective was to suggest ways of integrating local practices and traditions to enhance its acceptability.

methodsWe conducted 15 in-depth qualitative interviews with youth with self-harm and four interviews with the caregivers in the psychiatry department of a tertiary hospital located in Mumbai, India. Data were analysed using phenomenological thematic analysis.

findingsFive themes were uncovered: (i) contextual factors related to self-harm including interpersonal factors, intrapersonal factors and socio-cultural factors; (ii) formulation and current feelings about the attempt (iii) family members and friends as the perceived supports and deterrents for future self-harm attempts; (iv) treatment related experiences with counselling, in-patient and outpatient treatment and barriers to treatment; and (v) coping strategies. Recommendations for key areas of adaptation include therapist adaptation, content adaptation to accommodate for cultural considerations and broader social context. Gender based socio-cultural norms, beliefs and stigma attached to self-harm need to be specifically addressed in South Asian setting. Interpersonal conflicts are the most common triggers. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: To our knowledge this is the first study in the South Asian context evaluating explanatory styles of youth with self-harm and their caregivers to inform the design of an intervention to ensure its cultural congruence. Cultural adaptation of an evidence based PI results in competent delivery and ensures best results in diverse ethno-cultural populations.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdolescent BehaviorPsychosocial InterventionSelf-Injurious BehaviorSocial SupportAdolescentCaregiversCulturally Competent CareFemaleHumansIndiaMaleQualitative Researchsuicide & self-harm

Identifiers

PMID32651178
PMCPMC7116239
OpenAlexW3040898476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.