ReviewBiomedical journal2020
Multimodal neurocritical monitoring.
Review in Biomedical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic multimodal brain function monitoring enables quantitative severity grading and prognostic prediction in pediatric neurocritical care.Jornal de pediatria · 2026Article
- Early mobilization in neurocritical care as a threshold-regulated intervention: a narrative review of mechanistic integration and implications for neurological recovery and physiological stability.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Spreading depolarization in neurocritical care: a review of SD'S pathophysiological continuum and clinical translation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Micro- and Nano-Enhanced Intravascular Biosensors for Real-Time Monitoring, Early Disease Diagnosis, and Drug Therapy Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Pulmonary complications and respiratory management in neurocritical care: a narrative review.Chinese medical journal · 2022Review
- Cerebral multimodality monitoring in adult neurocritical care patients with acute brain injury: A narrative review.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- A Precision Medicine Agenda in Traumatic Brain Injury.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- A Review of Monitoring Methods for Cerebral Blood Oxygen Saturation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Trends and Challenges of Wearable Multimodal Technologies for Stroke Risk Prediction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Protecting the blossoming brain - Neurocritical care in children.Biomedical journal · 2020Article
- Recent update in pediatric neurocritical care: Preface.Biomedical journal · 2020Article
- Predictive value of multimodal neurological monitoring in the postoperative neurological dysfunction after cardiovascular surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurocritical monitoring is important in caring for patients in the neurological intensive care unit. Although clinical neurologic examination is standard for neurocritical monitoring, changes found during the examination are often late signs and insufficient to detect and prevent secondary brain injury. Therefore, various neuromonitoring tools have been developed to monitor different physiologic parameters, such as cerebral oxygenation, cerebral blood flow, cerebral pressure, cerebral autoregulation, cerebral electric activity, and cerebral metabolism. In this review, we have discussed current commonly used neurocritical monitoring tools. No single monitor is sufficient and perfect for neurocritical monitoring. Multimodal neurocritical monitoring is the current trend. However, the lack of common formatting standards and uncertainty of improvement in patients' outcomes warrant further studies of multimodal neurocritical monitoring. Nevertheless, multimodal neurocritical monitoring considers individual pathophysiological variations in patients or their injuries and allows clinicians to tailor individualized management decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.