Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32650975›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of surgery2020

Implementing an opioid reduction protocol in renal transplant recipients.

Marisa E Schwab, Hillary J Braun, Nancy L Ascher, Ryutaro Hirose

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marisa E SchwabDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA.
Hillary J BraunDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA.
Nancy L AscherDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ryutaro HiroseDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: ryutaro.hirose@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Filling a Void of Research (FAVOR) Training for Transplant SurgeonsT32AI125222 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PETER G STOCK, Minnie M Sarwal · 2016 to 2026
$3.4M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI125222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSix percent of opioid-naïve patients develop opioid dependence post-operatively. We implemented a protocol in our renal transplant recipients that eliminated opioid patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and included a multi-modal non-opioid regimen. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of PCA elimination on opioid requirements at discharge in renal transplant recipients.

methodsWe reviewed adult renal transplant recipients for the three months prior to, and following, the protocol's implementation. Patients with an intra-abdominal transplant, pancreas-renal transplant, or chronic pain were excluded. The number of opioid pills prescribed on the day prior to discharge were categorized as A) 0, B) 1-3, and C) ≥4. Discharge opioid prescriptions were then evaluated based on a recent recommendation that group A receive 0 pills, group B 15 pills, and group C 30 pills, to satisfy the outpatient pain needs of 85% of patients. Pre- and post-intervention metrics were compared using independent t-tests and Chi squared tests.

results150 recipients were included (79 pre-intervention, 71 post; 51% male). PCA use decreased significantly (81% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.001). Post-intervention, gabapentin, topical lidocaine, and acetaminophen increased significantly (6.3%-69%, p < 0.001, 5.1%-66.2%, p < 0.001, 73.4%-93% respectively, p = 0.003.) PCA use did not impact the amount of opioids prescribed at discharge (median 75 OMEs in both groups). Of patients requiring no opioids on the day prior to discharge regardless of PCA use, 51.5% of pre- and 35.5% of post- were prescribed excess opioids at discharge. Of patients prescribed 1-3 pills on the day prior to discharge regardless of PCA use, 24.2% of pre- and 25.8% of post patients were prescribed excessive opioids at discharge.

conclusionsA multidisciplinary approach to developing an opioid-reducing protocol significantly decreased the use of PCAs and increased the use of non-opioid adjunct medications in renal transplant recipients. Patients continued to be prescribed excess opioids at discharge compared to inpatient opioid use the day prior to discharge. Ongoing communication with all providers caring for renal transplant recipients and protocolization of the different stages of a patient's post-operative hospitalization are crucial.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesics, OpioidClinical ProtocolsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInappropriate PrescribingMaleMiddle AgedOpioid-Related DisordersPatient DischargePostoperative CareAnalgesics, OpioidOpioidsPCARenal transplantation

Identifiers

PMID32650975
PMCPMC9129056
OpenAlexW3039468329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.