Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32650725›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2020

Blood pressure control in patients with a previous stroke/transient ischaemic attack in primary care in Ireland: a cross sectional study.

Róisín Doogue, David McCann, Noirin Fitzgerald, Andrew W Murphy, Liam G Glynn, Peter Hayes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Róisín DoogueGraduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. roisin.doogue@ul.ie.ORCID 0000-0002-4539-3982
David McCannDepartment of General Practice & HRB Primary Care Clinical Trial Network Ireland, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Noirin FitzgeraldDepartment of General Practice & HRB Primary Care Clinical Trial Network Ireland, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Andrew W MurphyDepartment of General Practice & HRB Primary Care Clinical Trial Network Ireland, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Liam G GlynnGraduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Peter HayesGraduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEUniversity of Limerick · IE

Funding

Health Research Board Ireland SS-2019-010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUncontrolled blood pressure (BP) is an important modifiable risk factor for recurrent stroke. Secondary prevention measures when implemented can reduce stroke re-occurrence by 80%. However, hypertension control rates remain sub-optimal, and little data is available from primary care where most management occurs. The aim of this study was to describe BP control in primary care-based patients with a previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in Ireland, and to concurrently examine antihypertensive medication-dosing.

methodsStudy participants most recent office-based BP reading was compared with the NICE (NG136) and European Society of Hypertension/ European Society of Cardiology (ESH/ESC 2013) goal of BP < 140/90 mmHg. Optimal anti-hypertensive medication dosing was determined by benchmarking prescribed doses for each drug with the World Health Organisation-Defined Daily Dosing (WHO-DDD) recommendations.

resultsWe identified 328 patients with a previous stroke or TIA in 10 practices. Blood pressure was controlled in almost two thirds of patients when measured against the ESH/ESC and NICE guidelines (63.1%, n = 207). Of those with BP ≥140/90 (n = 116), just under half (n = 44, 47.3%) were adequately dosed in all anti-hypertensive medications when compared with the WHO-DDD recommendations.

conclusionBlood pressure control in patients post stroke/TIA appears sub-optimal in over one third of patients. A comparison of drug doses with WHO-DDD recommendations suggests that 47% of patients may benefit from drug-dose improvements. Further work is required to assess how best to manage blood pressure in patients with a previous stroke or TIA in Primary Care, as most consultations for hypertension take place in this setting.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure DeterminationHypertensionIschemic Attack, TransientPrimary Health CareSecondary PreventionStrokeAgedAntihypertensive AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansIrelandMalePractice Guidelines as TopicPrevalenceAntihypertensive AgentsBlood pressure guidelinesDosingHypertensionPrevalencePrimary careStroke

Identifiers

PMID32650725
PMCPMC7353812
OpenAlexW3040799962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.