ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020
Colonoscopy Screening Behaviour and Associated Factors Amongst First-Degree Relatives of People with Colorectal Cancer in China: Testing the Health Belief Model Using a Cross-Sectional Design.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health belief model and cervical cancer screening intention among lower socioeconomic women in Malaysia: a pilot study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Development and validation of colorectal cancer and colonoscopy screening health beliefs scale for first-degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer (CCHBS-FDR) in China.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Health Belief Model in Predicting Screening Behavior among Population at Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.Iranian journal of public health · 2025Review
- Prevalence of Screening Colonoscopy among the First-Degree Relatives of Patients with Colorectal Cancer and Related Factors.Middle East journal of digestive diseases · 2025Article
- Exploring factors influencing decision making for colonoscopy in first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer: a mixed-methods study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Is takeout culture associated with rising colorectal cancer in young Chinese adults? An ecological analysis of GBD and CHNS data.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Influencing factors of colonoscopy screening in first-degree relatives of hospitalized colorectal cancer patients and preliminary clinical practices to improve the compliance.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Colonoscopy Uptake in First-Degree Relatives of CRC Patients: Challenges and Intervention Strategies.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Review
- Pattern of Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening from a Population-Based Screening Program in Iran.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2024Observational
- Feasibility and acceptability of motivational interviewing to promote colorectal cancer screening among average risk Chinese older adults.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2023Article
- Assessment of Psychosocial Correlates and Associated Factors of Colorectal Cancer Screening among Southwestern Saudi Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Screening practices of cancer survivors and individuals whose family or friends had a cancer diagnoses-a nationally representative cross-sectional survey in Japan (INFORM Study 2020).Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023Article
- Screening behaviors and related factors among the first-degree relatives of Chinese patients with gastric cancer.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2023Article
- Relationship between health information literacy and health promoting lifestyle among first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer in China: the mediating effect of health belief.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of a tailored communication intervention on colonoscopy uptake for firstdegree relatives of colorectal cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2022Article
- Identifying the factors promoting colorectal cancer screening uptake in Hong Kong using Andersen's behavioural model of health services use.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Associations Between Cancer Fatalism, Causal Attributions, and Perceptions of Benefits and Barriers to Screening for Colorectal Cancer.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2022Article
- Screening Intention Prediction of Colorectal Cancer among Urban Chinese Based on the Protection Motivation Theory.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in Asia.Ecancermedicalscience · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colonoscopy is the best screening choice for at-risk persons, because it offers prevention through the removal of preneoplastic lesions in addition to early detection. This study aims to report the participation rate of colonoscopy screening and examine its associated factors amongst Chinese first-degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer based on the health belief model (HBM). A cross-sectional study was conducted in Shenzhen, China from March to May 2019. Demographic characteristics, family history, variables derived from the HBM and colonoscopy screening behaviours were measured through online surveys as the independent variables of interest. A total of 186 online surveys were returned, with a final response rate of 57.0%. The participation rate of colonoscopy was 15.6%. Univariate analysis (independent
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.