Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32650530›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

In Vitro Mechanical and Biological Properties of 3D Printed Polymer Composite and β-Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffold on Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells.

Shuaishuai Cao, Jonghyeuk Han, Neha Sharma, Bilal Msallem, Wonwoo Jeong, Jeonghyun Son, Christoph Kunz, Hyun-Wook Kang, Florian M Thieringer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Additive Manufacturing Processes in Medical Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuaishuai CaoDepartment of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7112-2257
Jonghyeuk HanBiomedical Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), 50, UNIST-gil, Ulsan 44919, Korea.
Neha SharmaDepartment of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3299-0945
Bilal MsallemDepartment of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0885-1195
Wonwoo JeongBiomedical Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), 50, UNIST-gil, Ulsan 44919, Korea.
Jeonghyun SonBiomedical Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), 50, UNIST-gil, Ulsan 44919, Korea.
Christoph KunzDepartment of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Hyun-Wook KangBiomedical Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), 50, UNIST-gil, Ulsan 44919, Korea.
Florian M ThieringerDepartment of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3035-9308
Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology · KRUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

Bilateral Science and Technology cooperation program with Asia IPG 01-112019Osteology Foundation 19-031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D printed biomaterials have been extensively investigated and developed in the field of bone regeneration related to clinical issues. However, specific applications of 3D printed biomaterials in different dental areas have seldom been reported. In this study, we aimed to and successfully fabricated 3D poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)/β-tricalcium phosphate (3D-PLGA/TCP) and 3D β-tricalcium phosphate (3D-TCP) scaffolds using two relatively distinct 3D printing (3DP) technologies. Conjunctively, we compared and investigated mechanical and biological responses on human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs). Physicochemical properties of the scaffolds, including pore structure, chemical elements, and compression modulus, were characterized. hDPSCs were cultured on scaffolds for subsequent investigations of biocompatibility and osteoconductivity. Our findings indicate that 3D printed PLGA/TCP and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) scaffolds possessed a highly interconnected and porous structure. 3D-TCP scaffolds exhibited better compressive strength than 3D-PLGA/TCP scaffolds, while the 3D-PLGA/TCP scaffolds revealed a flexible mechanical performance. The introduction of 3D structure and β-TCP components increased the adhesion and proliferation of hDPSCs and promoted osteogenic differentiation. In conclusion, 3D-PLGA/TCP and 3D-TCP scaffolds, with the incorporation of hDPSCs as a personalized restoration approach, has a prospective potential to repair minor and critical bone defects in oral and maxillofacial surgery, respectively.

Indexed as

3D printingbone regenerationceramic printingdental biomaterialshuman dental pulp stem cellin vitro researchpolymer printing

Identifiers

PMID32650530
PMCPMC7412522
OpenAlexW3041192267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.