Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32650480›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

A Pilot Study for the Feasibility of Exome-Sequencing in Circulating Tumor Cells Versus Single Metastatic Biopsies in Breast Cancer.

Pushpinder Kaur, Daniel Campo, Tania B Porras, Alexander Ring, Janice Lu, Yvonne Chairez, Yunyun Su, Irene Kang, Julie E Lang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Technologies for Viable Circulating Tumor Cell Isolation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pushpinder KaurDepartment of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Daniel CampoDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Tania B PorrasCancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA.
Alexander RingDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.
Janice LuUniversity of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Yvonne ChairezDepartment of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Yunyun SuDepartment of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Irene KangUniversity of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Julie E LangDepartment of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7534-6124
University of Southern California · USUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The comparison of the landscape of somatic alterations in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) versus metastases is challenging. Here, we comprehensively characterized the somatic landscape in bulk (amplified and non-amplified), spike-in breast cancer cells, CTCs, and metastases from breast cancer patients using whole-exome sequencing (WES). We determined the level of genomic concordance for somatic nucleotide variants (SNVs), copy number alterations (CNAs), and structural variants (SVs). The variant allele fractions (VAFs) of somatic variants were remarkably similar between amplified and non-amplified cell line samples as technical replicates. In clinical samples, a significant fraction of somatic variants had low VAFs in CTCs compared to metastases. The most frequently recurrent gene mutations in clinical samples were associated with an elevated C > T mutational signature. We found complex rearrangement patterns including intra- and inter-chromosomal rearrangements, singleton, and recurrent gene fusions, and tandem duplications. We observed high molecular discordance for somatic alterations between paired samples consistent with marked heterogeneity of the somatic landscape. The most prevalent copy number calls were focal deletion events in CTCs and metastases. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of an integrated workflow for the identification of a complete repertoire of somatic alterations and highlight the intrapatient genomic differences that occur between CTCs and metastases.

Indexed as

AllelesBiopsyBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDNA Copy Number VariationsExomeExome SequencingFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMutationNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPilot Projectsbreast cancercirculating tumor cellsclinically actionablemetastasiswhole exome sequencingwhole genome amplification

Identifiers

PMID32650480
PMCPMC7402350
OpenAlexW3041222557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.