ArticlePloS one2020
Diagnostic criteria for left ventricular non-compaction in cardiac computed tomography.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- How should we interpret excessive left ventricular trabeculation? Update on controversies from the cardiac imaging perspective.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Left Ventricular Non-Compaction Cardiomyopathy: The Tragedies & Trabeculations of the Architectural Cardiac Sponge.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Denoising pediatric cardiac photon-counting CT data with sparse coding and data-adaptive, self-supervised deep learning.Medical physics · 2025Article
- A proposed strategy for anticoagulation therapy in noncompaction cardiomyopathy.ESC heart failure · 2022Review
- Computed tomography assessment of saw-tooth cardiomyopathy: a case series.European heart journal. Case reports · 2022Article
- Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy-History and Current Knowledge for Clinical Practice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLeft ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) is characterized by a 2-layered myocardium composed of a noncompacted (NC) and a compacted (C) layer. The echocardiographic NC:C ratio is difficult to assess in many patients. The aim of the study was to assess the value of cardiac computed tomography (CCT) for the diagnosis of LVNC.
methodsIn this prospective controlled study, segmental analysis of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and prospective ECG-triggered CCT was performed in 17 patients with LVNC and 19 healthy controls. In TTE maximal NC and C thickness was measured at enddiastole and endsystole in the segment with most prominent trabeculation in short axis views. In CCT, maximal segmental NC and C thickness was measured during diastole, and NC:C ratio was determined. Spearman's correlation coefficient and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated.
resultsThe median [IQR] radiation dose was 1.3[1.2-1.5]mSv. The CCT thickness of the C layer was significantly lower in patients with LVNC as compared to controls in the inferolateral, midventricular, lateral-, inferior-, and septal-apical segments. The CCT NC:C ratio differed significantly between LVNC and controls in the inferior-midventricular and all the apical segments. NC:C ratio correlated significantly between TTE and CCT at enddiastole (σ = 0.8) and endsystole (σ = 0.9). Using a CCT NC:C ratio ≥1.8, all LVNC patients could be identified.
conclusionLVNC can be diagnosed with ECG-triggered low-dose CCT and discriminated from normal individuals using a NC:C ratio of ≥1.8 in diastole. There is a very good correlation of NC:C ratio in TTE and CCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.