Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32649579›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2020

Epidemiologic Treatment for Contacts to Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis Infection in Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic Patients in Seattle, WA; 1994 to 2018.

Emily Rowlinson, Matthew R Golden, Anna Berzkalns, Christina Thibault, Lindley A Barbee

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Should we still treat asymptomaticSexually transmitted infections · 2026
    Article
  2. Evaluating a new partner management strategy for bacterial sexually transmitted infections after a change in 2020 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2017 to 2023.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Prior Exposure to Azithromycin and Azithromycin Resistance Among Persons Diagnosed With Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infection at a Sexual Health Clinic: 2012-2019.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily RowlinsonFrom the Departments of Epidemiology.
Matthew R Golden
Anna BerzkalnsHIV/STD Program, Public Health-Seattle & King County, Seattle, WA.
Christina ThibaultHIV/STD Program, Public Health-Seattle & King County, Seattle, WA.
Lindley A Barbee
Public Health – Seattle & King County · US

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI EDWIN ROBERTO ORELLANA · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
VENEREAL DISEASET32AI007140 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Julia Cook Dombrowski · 1985 to 2026
$19.4M
Impact of the vaginal microbiome on Chlamydia trachomatis acquisitionR01AI132441 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MCCLELLAND, RAYMOND SCOTT · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
Quantifying the Use of Epidemiologic Treatment and its Role in the Development of Antimicrobial-Resistant N. gonorrhoeae among Men who have Sex with Men (MSM)R03AI156261 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BARBEE, LINDLEY · 2021 to 2022
$147k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI132441NIAID NIH HHS R03 AI156261NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines recommend that clinicians empirically treat the sex partners of persons with Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) or Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infection before confirming that they are infected. It is possible that this practice, known as epidemiologic treatment, results in overtreatment for uninfected persons and may contribute to development of antimicrobial resistance. We sought to quantify the number of patients who received epidemiologic treatment and the proportion of those who were overtreated.

methodsWe reviewed records from a municipal sexually transmitted disease clinic in Seattle, WA, from 1994 to 2018 to identify visits by asymptomatic patients seeking care because of sexual contact to a partner with GC and/or CT. We defined overtreatment as receipt of antibiotic(s) in the absence of a positive GC/CT test result and calculated the proportions of contacts epidemiologically treated and tested positive for GC/CT and overtreated in five 5-year periods stratified by sex and gender of sex partner. We used the Cochran-Armitage test to assess for temporal trends.

resultsThe number of asymptomatic contacts epidemiologically treated for GC/CT increased from 949 to 3159 between the 1994-1998 and 2014-2018 periods. In 2014-2018, 55% of persons were overtreated, most (82.1%) of these were men who have sex with men (MSM). The proportion of MSM overtreated decreased from 74% to 65% (P < 0.01), but the total number of overtreated MSM increased from 172 to 1428. DISCUSSION: A high proportion of persons receiving epidemiologic treatment of GC/CT are uninfected. The current practice of routinely treating all sex partners of persons with GC/CT merits reconsideration in light of growing antimicrobial resistance.

Indexed as

GonorrheaNeisseria gonorrhoeaeChlamydia trachomatisFemaleHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleSexual and Gender Minorities

Identifiers

PMID32649579
PMCPMC8549494
OpenAlexW3040945050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.