Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32649062›Full record

SynthesisESC heart failure2020

Multimarker approach including CRP, sST2 and GDF-15 for prognostic stratification in stable heart failure.

Nils Kuster, Fabien Huet, Anne-Marie Dupuy, Mariama Akodad, Pascal Battistella, Audrey Agullo, Florence Leclercq, Eran Kalmanovich, Alexandra Meilhac, Sylvain Aguilhon and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in ESC heart failure, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05992558 (Development of Longitudinal Multimarker Risk Models for Decision Support Across the Clinical Follow-up of Very Elderly Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05992558 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Development of Longitudinal Multimarker Risk Models for Decision Support Across the Clinical Follow-up of Very Elderly Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFundacion para la Investigacion Biomedica del Hospital Universitario Ramon y CajalRan2023 to 2026Enrolled184ConditionsHeart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. One Syndrome, Many Faces: A Unified Perspective on Heart Failure Phenotypes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Heart failure, inflammation and exercise.International journal of biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nils KusterDepartment of Biochemistry, Centre Ressources Biologiques de Montpellier, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Fabien HuetCardiology Department, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Anne-Marie DupuyDepartment of Biochemistry, Centre Ressources Biologiques de Montpellier, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Mariama AkodadCardiology Department, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Pascal BattistellaCardiology Department, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Audrey AgulloCardiology Department, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Florence LeclercqCardiology Department, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Eran KalmanovichCardiology Department, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Alexandra MeilhacCardiology Department, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Sylvain AguilhonCardiology Department, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Jean-Paul CristolDepartment of Biochemistry, Centre Ressources Biologiques de Montpellier, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Francois RoubilleCardiology Department, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FRPhysiologie et Médecine Expérimentale du Coeur et des Muscles · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsInflammation and cardiac remodelling are common and synergistic pathways in heart failure (HF). Emerging biomarkers such as soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) and growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), which are linked to inflammation and fibrosis process, have been proposed as prognosis factors. However, their potential additive values remain poorly investigated. METHODS AND

resultsHere, we aimed at evaluating inflammatory and remodelling biomarkers to predict both short-term and long-term mortality in a population with chronic HF in comparison with other classical clinical or biological markers (i.e. N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide, hs-cTnT, C-reactive protein) alone or using meta-analysis global group in chronic HF risk score in a cohort of 182 patients followed during 80 months (interquartile range: 12.3-90.0). Proportional hazard assumption does not hold for sST2 and C-reactive protein, and follow-up was split into short term (less than 1 year), midterm (between 1 and 5 years), and long term (after 5 years). In univariate analysis, C-reactive protein and sST2 were predictive of short-term mortality but not of middle term and long term whereas GDF-15 was predictive of short and mid-term but not of long-term mortality. In a multivariate model after adjustment for meta-analysis global group in chronic HF score including the three markers, only sST2 was predictive of short-term mortality (P = 0.0225), and only GDF-15 was predictive of middle term mortality (P = 0.0375). None of the markers was predictive of long-term mortality.

conclusionsOur results demonstrate that both sST2 and GDF-15 significantly improve the prognosis evaluation of HF patients and suggest that the value of GDF-15 is more sustained overtime and could predict middle term events.

Indexed as

Growth Differentiation Factor 15Heart FailureBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinHumansInterleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 ProteinPrognosisBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinGDF15 protein, humanGrowth Differentiation Factor 15IL1RL1 protein, humanInterleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 ProteinBiomarkersC-reactive proteinGDF-15Heart failureHs-troponinNT-proBNPPrognosissST2

Identifiers

PMID32649062
PMCPMC7524044
OpenAlexW3041562517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.