Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32648913›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2020

Enhancing Psychosis Risk Prediction Through Computational Cognitive Neuroscience.

James M Gold, Philip R Corlett, Gregory P Strauss, Jason Schiffman, Lauren M Ellman, Elaine F Walker, Albert R Powers, Scott W Woods, James A Waltz, Steven M Silverstein and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. DifferentialScience advances · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

James M GoldDepartment of Psychiatry and Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Philip R CorlettDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Gregory P StraussDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Jason SchiffmanUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore, MD.
Lauren M EllmanDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Elaine F WalkerDepartment of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Albert R PowersDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Scott W WoodsDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
James A WaltzDepartment of Psychiatry and Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Steven M SilversteinDepartments of Psychiatry, Neuroscience, and Ophthalmology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
Vijay A MittalDepartments of Psychology, Psychiatry, Medical Social Sciences, Institutes for Policy Research (IPR) and Innovations in Developmental Sciences (DevSci), Evanston and Chicago, IL.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
2/9 - Predictors and Mechanisms of Conversion to PsychosisU01MH081988 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI WALKER, ELAINE FRAN · 2008 to 2018
$5.4M
5/5 CAPER: Computerized Assessment of Psychosis RiskR01MH120089 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CORLETT, PHILIP, WOODS, SCOTT W · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
Prodromal Inventory for Negative Symptoms (PINS): A Development and Validation StudyR01MH116039 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI MITTAL, VIJAY A, STRAUSS, GREGORY P · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
1/5 CAPER: Computerized Assessment of ProdromE RiskR01MH120090 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI GOLD, JAMES M. · 2020 to 2024
$2.9M
Reward System Function as a Potential Mediator of the Impact of Stress on Psychopathology: A Computational Neuroimaging StudyR01MH115031 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI WALTZ, JAMES A · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
4/5 CAPER: Computerized assessment of psychosis riskR01MH120092 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI STRAUSS, GREGORY P · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
2/5 CAPER Computerized assessment of psychosis riskR01MH120088 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI MITTAL, VIJAY A · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
1/3-Community Psychosis Risk Screening: An Instrument Development Study SupplementR01MH112613 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI ELLMAN, LAUREN M · 2017 to 2022
$1.8M
CAPER: Computerized Assessment of Psychosis Risk SupplementR01MH120091 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI ELLMAN, LAUREN M · 2020 to 2024
$1.6M
Administrative Supplement - 3/3: Community Psychology Risk Screening: An Instrument Development StudyR01MH112612 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY · PI PITTS, STEVEN C, SCHIFFMAN, JASON E · 2017 to 2022
$1.3M
2/3 Community psychosis risk screening: An instrument development studyR01MH112545 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI MITTAL, VIJAY A · 2017 to 2021
$1.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112545NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112612NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112613NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115031NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116039NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120088NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120089NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120090NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120091NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120092NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH119438NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH081988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research suggests that early identification and intervention with individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis may be able to improve the course of illness. The first generation of studies suggested that the identification of CHR through the use of specialized interviews evaluating attenuated psychosis symptoms is a promising strategy for exploring mechanisms associated with illness progression, etiology, and identifying new treatment targets. The next generation of research on psychosis risk must address two major limitations: (1) interview methods have limited specificity, as recent estimates indicate that only 15%-30% of individuals identified as CHR convert to psychosis and (2) the expertise needed to make CHR diagnosis is only accessible in a handful of academic centers. Here, we introduce a new approach to CHR assessment that has the potential to increase accessibility and positive predictive value. Recent advances in clinical and computational cognitive neuroscience have generated new behavioral measures that assay the cognitive mechanisms and neural systems that underlie the positive, negative, and disorganization symptoms that are characteristic of psychotic disorders. We hypothesize that measures tied to symptom generation will lead to enhanced sensitivity and specificity relative to interview methods and the cognitive intermediate phenotype measures that have been studied to date that are typically indicators of trait vulnerability and, therefore, have a high false positive rate for conversion to psychosis. These new behavioral measures have the potential to be implemented on the internet and at minimal expense, thereby increasing accessibility of assessments.

Indexed as

Cognitive NeuroscienceDisease ProgressionHumansProdromal SymptomsPrognosisPsychotic DisordersRisk AssessmentSchizophreniaclinical high riskconversionschizophrenia prodrome

Identifiers

PMID32648913
PMCPMC7707066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.