Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32648889›Full record

ArticleGenetics and molecular biology2020

Cytogenetic analysis of the genus Thoropa Cope, 1865 (Anura-Cycloramphidae) with evolutionary inferences based on repetitive sequences.

Luiza Rieder Cholak, Célio F B Haddad, Patrícia P Parise-Maltempi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics and molecular biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luiza Rieder CholakUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Biociências, Programa de Pós-graduação em Biologia Celular e Molecular, Rio Claro, SP, Brazil.
Célio F B HaddadUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Biociências, Laboratório de Herpetologia, Departmento de Biodiversidade e Centro de Aquacultura (CAUNESP), Rio Claro, SP, Brazil.
Patrícia P Parise-MaltempiUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Biociências, Programa de Pós-graduação em Biologia Celular e Molecular, Rio Claro, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7414-9463

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytogenetics can be a useful tool to assist in taxonomic problems by adding information to the widely used morphological and molecular approaches. These taxonomic problems are especially common in anurans, once they are very diverse, highly polymorphic, and present many cryptic species. The genus Thoropa Cope, 1865 is composed of six specialist species that reproduce in rocky outcrops and are distributed throughout the Atlantic Forest and Cerrado ecotones. Phylogenetic studies point to possible cryptic species within the T. miliaris group. To assist in the evolutionary and taxonomic understanding of this group, classical cytogenetic techniques were used to find possible molecular markers for the genus through rDNA5S, rDNA18S, and U2snDNA probes and analyze their chromosome distribution in the group of T. miliaris. Despite the well conserved karyotype under conventional staining and classical techniques, such as Ag-NOR, our C-banding results showed differences in the centromeric heterochromatin concentration between two populations of T. miliaris. Furthermore, some differences among the populations and species were found for rDNA5S and U2snDNA. This study contributes to a better understanding of the evolutionary relationships within the genus; however, the use of different probe sequences, such as satDNA, is essential for a more robust cytogenetic analysis.

Identifiers

PMID32648889
PMCPMC7344750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.