ArticleHuman factors2021
Human Cognition in Interaction With Robots: Taking the Robot's Perspective Into Account.
Article in Human factors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Methodological Framework for Studying Online Language-Vision Interplay in Human-Robot Interaction.Journal of psycholinguistic research · 2026Article
- Article
- Dynamic three-sided matching model for personnel-robot-position matching problem in intelligent environments.PloS one · 2023Article
- Seeing through the cat's eyes: evidence of a spontaneous perspective taking process using a non-human avatar.Cognitive processing · 2022Article
- Number to me, space to you: Joint representation of spatial-numerical associations.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2022Article
- Perspective Taking and Avatar-Self Merging.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe present study investigated whether and how different human-robot interactions in a physically shared workspace influenced human stimulus-response (SR) relationships.
backgroundHuman work is increasingly performed in interaction with advanced robots. Since human-robot interaction often takes place in physical proximity, it is crucial to investigate the effects of the robot on human cognition.
methodIn two experiments, we compared conditions in which humans interacted with a robot that they either remotely controlled or monitored under otherwise comparable conditions in the same shared workspace. The cognitive extent to which the participants took the robot's perspective served as a dependent variable and was evaluated with a SR compatibility task.
resultsThe results showed pronounced compatibility effects from the robot's perspective when participants had to take the perspective of the robot during the task, but significantly reduced compatibility effects when human and robot did not interact. In both experiments, compatibility effects from the robot's perspective resulted in statistically significant differences in response times and in error rates between compatible and incompatible conditions.
conclusionWe concluded that SR relationships from the perspective of the robot need to be considered when designing shared workspaces that require users to take the perspective of the robot. APPLICATION: The results indicate changed compatibility relationships when users share their workplace with an interacting robot and therefore have to take its perspective from time to time. The perspective-dependent processing times are expected to be accompanied by corresponding error rates, which might affect-for instance-safety and efficiency in a production process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.