Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32648382›Full record

ArticleThe world journal of men's health2021

Survey of Microsurgery Training Availability in US Urology Residency Programs.

Thomas A Masterson, Sirpi Nackeeran, Quinn Rainer, Nicholas Hauser, Robert Marcovich, Ranjith Ramasamy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The world journal of men's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Creation and evaluation of a three-dimensional-printed synthetic vas deferens for microsurgical training.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas A MastersonDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. tmasterson@miami.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5211-9271
Sirpi NackeeranDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6950-2645
Quinn RainerDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4543-2697
Nicholas HauserDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1197-3038
Robert MarcovichDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3711-3522
Ranjith RamasamyDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1387-7904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) establishes surgical minimum numbers of cases for urologic training. Currently there is not a requirement for microsurgery, likely from a belief that programs do not offer exposure. In an effort to evaluate the availability of microsurgery training among urology residency programs we surveyed the programs. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe obtained a list of the 138 ACGME-accredited urology residencies and contact information the American Urology Association (AUA). We contacted the residency programs by phone and e-mail. For programs that did not reply, we performed a search of the program website. We answered 3-questions to assess resident subspecialty training in microsurgery and used penile implant and artificial urinary sphincters as a comparison. Data are reported as frequencies.

resultsWe obtained data from 134 programs (97.1%). A total of 104 programs (77.6%) had fellowship-trained physicians for training in microsurgery, 86.6% for penile implants, and 88.8% for artificial urinary sphincters. The percentage of fellowship-trained microsurgeons per program did not vary significantly when comparing the different sections of the AUA. The northeast and southeast sections had the lowest percentage (67% and 68%).

conclusionsNearly 80% of urology residency programs have a fellowship-trained microsurgeon on faculty, we therefore believe that microsurgery should be added as part of the ACGME minimums. In order to provide an equal exposure to all graduating urology residents, urology residency programs that lack microsurgery should identify potential faculty with fellowship training.

Indexed as

AndrologyInfertilityMicrosurgeryResidencyTraining techniques

Identifiers

PMID32648382
PMCPMC7994659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.