Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32648376›Full record

ReviewThe world journal of men's health2021

Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Pathologic Outcomes in Prostate Cancer.

Niklas Harland, Arnulf Stenzl, Tilman Todenhöfer

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The world journal of men's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Niklas HarlandDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5532-4868
Arnulf StenzlDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4207-9928
Tilman TodenhöferMedical School, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4432-2741
University Children's Hospital Tübingen · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and the introduction of standardized protocols for its interpretation have had a significant impact on the field of prostate cancer (PC). Multiple randomized controlled trials have shown that the sensitivity for detection of clinically significant PC is increased when mpMRI results are the basis for indication of a prostate biopsy. The added value with regards to sensitivity has been strongest for patients with persistent suspicion for PC after a prior negative biopsy. Although enhanced sensitivity of mpMRI is convincing, studies that have compared mpMRI with prostatectomy specimens prepared by whole-mount section analysis have shown a significant number of lesions that were not detected by mpMRI. In this context, the importance of an additional systematic biopsy (SB) is still being debated. While SB in combination with targeted biopsies leads to an increased detection rate, most of the tumors detected by SB only are considered clinically insignificant. Currently, multiple risk calculation tools are being developed that include not only clinical parameters but mpMRI results in addition to clinical parameters in order to improve risk stratification for PC, such as the Partin tables. In summary, mpMRI of the prostate has become a standard procedure recommended by multiple important guidelines for the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspicion of PC.

Indexed as

BiopsyDiagnostic imagingEarly detection of cancerMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID32648376
PMCPMC7752518
OpenAlexW3037371610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.