ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2020
Prognostic Role of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Interacting Protein (AIP) Immunohistochemical Expression in Patients with Resected Gastric Carcinomas.
Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Aryl-hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein regulates tumorigenic and metastatic properties of colorectal cancer cells driving liver metastasis.British journal of cancer · 2022Pooled it
- Context-dependent functions of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in gastrointestinal cancers: from microenvironmental regulation to precision targeted therapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) interacting protein (AIP) is a chaperone which binds to inactive AHR in the cell cytoplasm. AHR is best known for mediating the toxicity of halogenated aromatics, but it has also been linked to carcinogenesis and tumor progression in several tumor types. Our aims are to assess the features of AIP immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and to evaluate its possible role as a prognostic marker in gastric cancer (GC). Retrospective study of 147 cases of resected GC. Clinicopathological features were collected, tissue microarrays were constructed for AIP IHC and statistical analysis were performed. AIP staining was observed in 50.3% of tumors. All AIP-positive cases exhibited cytoplasmic or membranous staining, variably associated with nuclear co-staining. 93.2% of AIP-positive tumors showed AIP immunoreactivity in 100% of cells. Staining intensity was mild, moderate and intense in 33.8%, 13.5% and 52.7% of cases. Tumors were stratified according to AIP staining intensity into low expression (no or mild AIP immunoreactivity) and high expression (moderate or intense AIP immunoreactivity). 36.6% of our cases showed high AIP expression. High AIP expression was significantly and independently correlated to tumor progression and cancer death. Tumors with high AIP expression showed lower survival and higher progression rates. AIP expression might be useful for determining GC prognosis. More studies are needed to clarify the role of AHR pathway in GC, AIP expression and its potential use as a surrogate marker for selecting patients for AHR modulation therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.