Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32648158›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular toxicology2021

The Protective Effects of Compound 21 and Valsartan in Isoproterenol-Induced Myocardial Injury in Rats.

Zeynep Ulutas, Necip Ermis, Onural Ozhan, Hakan Parlakpinar, Nigar Vardi, Burhan Ates, Cemil Colak

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular toxicology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The Angiotensin ATPharmacological reviews · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zeynep UlutasDepartment of Cardiology, Elazig State Hospital, 23100, Elazig, Turkey. drzeynepulutas@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6078-7480
Necip ErmisDepartment of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Onural OzhanDepartment of Medical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Hakan ParlakpinarDepartment of Medical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Nigar VardiDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Burhan AtesDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Arts, İnonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Cemil ColakDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Inonu University · TRElazığ Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the protective effects of Compound 21 (C21), the first specific non-peptide AT2 receptor agonist, on cardiac injury in rats with isoproterenol-induced heart failure in vivo and compared it with valsartan, an AT1 receptor antagonist. In this study, 56 Wistar albino male rats (estimated body weights 250-400 g) were divided into eight groups (n = 7). Group 1 (Control) received no drug. Group 2 (ISO) was given 180 mg/kg of isoproterenol subcutaneously (s.c.); two doses were administered at 24-h intervals on days 29 and 30 of the experiment. Groups 3, 4, and 5 were given valsartan (30 mg/kg orally), C21 (0.03 mg/kg intraperitoneally), and a combination of Valsartan + C21, respectively, for 30 days. Groups 6, 7, and 8 were administered Valsartan, C21, and Valsartan + C21 in the same application, duration, and dose, respectively, and isoproterenol (180 mg/kg s.c.) was given on days 29 and 30 of the experiment. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed on the rats at the beginning and end of the experiment. Blood pressure, heart rate, and ECG alterations were monitored via a carotid artery cannula at the end of the experiment. Histopathological and biochemical measurements were performed on the cardiac tissue of the rats. For histopathological findings, C21 and Valsartan + C21 combination therapy significantly reduced the development of heart failure compared to valsartan alone. Also, the protective effect of C21 on myocardial injury was superior to that of valsartan. According to the results of echocardiographic and biochemical evaluations, C21, and Valsartan showed protective effects against heart failure. C21, valsartan, and combined therapy significantly prevented the decrease of ejection fraction. This report describes the cardioprotective effects of C21 and valsartan in ISO-induced myocardial damage.

Indexed as

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDrug Therapy, CombinationHeart FailureHeart RateIsoproterenolMaleMyocardiumRatsRats, WistarReceptor, Angiotensin, Type 2Stroke VolumeSulfonamidesThiophenesValsartanAgtr2 protein, ratAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersIsoproterenolN-butyloxycarbonyl-3-(4-imidazol-1-ylmethylphenyl)-5-isobutylthiophene-2-sulfonamideReceptor, Angiotensin, Type 2SulfonamidesThiophenesValsartanAngiotensin IICompound 21 (C21)Heart failure (HF)Valsartan

Identifiers

PMID32648158
OpenAlexW3041427552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.