Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32648041›Full record

ArticleTargeted oncology2020

Clinical Relevance of BRAF V600E Mutation Status in Brain Tumors with a Focus on a Novel Management Algorithm.

Adam Kowalewski, Justyna Durślewicz, Marek Zdrenka, Dariusz Grzanka, Łukasz Szylberg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Targeted oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Non-Meningothelial Mesenchymal Tumor of the Central Nervous System: Case Report and Literature Review.Neuropathology : official journal of the Japanese Society of Neuropathology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Cellular senescence in glioma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam KowalewskiDepartment of Clinical Pathomorphology, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland. kowalewskiresearch@gmail.com.
Justyna DurślewiczDepartment of Clinical Pathomorphology, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland.
Marek ZdrenkaDepartment of Clinical Pathomorphology, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland.
Dariusz GrzankaDepartment of Clinical Pathomorphology, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland.
Łukasz SzylbergDepartment of Clinical Pathomorphology, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland.
Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The possible application of BRAF-targeted therapy in brain tumors is growing continuously. We have analyzed clinical strategies that address BRAF activation in primary brain tumors and verified current recommendations regarding screening for BRAF mutations. There is preliminary evidence for a range of positive responses in certain brain tumor types harboring the BRAF V600E mutation. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines for central nervous system cancers recommend screening for the BRAF V600E mutation in pilocytic astrocytoma, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, and ganglioglioma. We suggest additional testing in glioblastomas WHO grade IV below the age of 30 years, especially those with epithelioid features, papillary craniopharyngiomas, and pediatric low-grade astrocytomas. BRAF-targeted therapy should be limited to the setting of a clinical trial. If the patient harboring a V600E mutation does not qualify for a trial, multimodality treatment is recommended. Dual inhibition of both RAF and MEK is expected to provide more potent and durable effects than anti-BRAF monotherapy. First-generation RAF inhibitors should be avoided. Gain-of-function mutations of EGFR and KIAA fusions may compromise BRAF-targeted therapy. BRAF alterations that result in MAPK pathway activation are common events in several types of brain tumors. BRAF V600E mutation emerges as a promising molecular target. The proposed algorithm was designed to help oncologists to provide the best therapeutic options for brain tumor patients.

Indexed as

MutationAlgorithmsBrain NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafBRAF protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID32648041
PMCPMC7434793
OpenAlexW3041400223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.