Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32648037›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021

Same-day discharge is safe and feasible following POEM surgery for esophageal motility disorders.

Zacharie Cloutier, Aneetinder Mann, Aristithes G Doumouras, Dennis Hong

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06918730 (Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06918730 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)Comparing Clinical Outcomes Between Underwater Versus Carbon Dioxide Insufflation During Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (U-POEM Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAdventHealthRan2025 to 2026Enrolled34ConditionsEsophageal Motility DisordersArmsU-POEM, CO2-POEM
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Saudi Gastroenterology Association (SGA) clinical care pathway and standards of care for peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in achalasia.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. North American Expert Consensus on the Post-procedural Care of Patients After Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy Using a Delphi Process.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Impact of Early Nutrition Following Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Achalasia: A Tertiary Center Experience.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zacharie CloutierDepartment of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Aneetinder MannDepartment of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Aristithes G DoumourasDepartment of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Dennis HongDepartment of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. dennishong70@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1792-1255

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPer-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an effective treatment for achalasia and other esophageal dysmotility disorders. Current practices surrounding post-operative care involve admission and routine esophagogram prior to discharge. This study aims to establish the safety and feasibility of same-day discharge following POEM.

methodsRetrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for patients who underwent POEM between November 2013 and June 2019 at a single institution in Ontario, Canada. Patients were discharged home on the same day with controlled pain, when tolerating clear fluids. Patients were admitted if clinically indicated. Esophagography was initially a systematic practice prior to discharge, but later only performed when clinically indicated. Emergency department visits and hospital admissions within 90 days were assessed.

resultsIn total, 90 patients underwent a successful POEM procedure. A total of 72 patients (79.1%) were discharged on the same day, 14 patients (15.4%) were discharged home the following day, and 5 patients (5.5%) experienced longer admissions to hospital. One POEM was unsuccessful. 22 (24.2%) patients had adverse events, leading to 8 (8.8%) unplanned admissions, with one patient requiring prolonged admission for esophageal leak, identified clinically. Fifty-three patients underwent routine esophagography while part of our protocol, with no identified leak, which prompted our change in practice to only perform esophagography when clinically indicated. In the 90-day post-procedure, ten patients visited the emergency department, of which seven were re-admitted, five for POEM-related issues. Our mean Eckhardt score at 2 weeks was 2.1 from 7.2 preoperatively.

conclusionThis study establishes that same-day discharge is both safe and feasible following POEM and suggests that esophagography should be performed only when clinically indicated. This represents a shift from the routine practice of admission and imaging for patients undergoing POEM, encouraging the transition to outpatient POEM procedures.

Indexed as

Esophageal AchalasiaEsophageal Motility DisordersNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryEsophageal Sphincter, LowerHumansOntarioPatient DischargeRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeLength of stayPOEM surgerySafety

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.