Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32648003›Full record

ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2020

Scribes, EHRs, and Workflow Efficiencies in Allergy Practices.

Annette F Carlisle, Saul M Greenbaum, Mike S Tankersley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Annette F CarlisleDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pulmonary, Sleep, Allergy and Immunology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Saul M GreenbaumDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pulmonary, Sleep, Allergy and Immunology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Mike S TankersleyDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pulmonary, Sleep, Allergy and Immunology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA. mtanker6@uthsc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9986-8528

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIn the ever-changing healthcare system, along with new advancements in the field of allergy, the workflow for the allergist continues to evolve requiring more time spent doing non-clinical duties such as documentation and reviewing reimbursement challenges in the midst of busy clinics. The use of electronic medical records and medical scribes has emerged as tactics to aid the clinic's workflow and efficiency in the modern allergy and immunology clinic. RECENT

findingsThe practicing allergist can implement various additional strategies in their office workflow to maximize and synthesize good medicine and good business. Optimal use of office staff, electronic health records, and various workflow efficiencies has been shown to improve job satisfaction and reduce physician burnout. By utilizing these methods and integrating them into their practices, allergists will be able to meet the demands of the healthcare system and still provide patients with evidence based, compassionate, and cost-effective care.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHumansHypersensitivityMedical Record AdministratorsWorkflowElectronic health recordsScribesWorkflowWorkplace efficiencies

Identifiers

PMID32648003
PMCPMC7344040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.