Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32647995›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

Supportive care and osteopathic medicine in pediatric oncology: perspectives of current oncology clinicians, caregivers, and patients.

Jennifer A Belsky, Joseph Stanek, Micah A Skeens, Cynthia A Gerhardt, Melissa J Rose

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer A BelskyPediatric Hematology/Oncology/BMT, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA. Jennifer.belsky@nationwidechildrens.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2260-0395
Joseph StanekPediatric Hematology/Oncology/BMT, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA.
Micah A SkeensPediatric Hematology/Oncology/BMT, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA.
Cynthia A GerhardtDepartments of Pediatrics and Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Melissa J RosePediatric Hematology/Oncology/BMT, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA.
Nationwide Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital AWD00000540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveMany children receiving chemotherapy struggle with therapy-induced side effects. To date, there has been no literature investigating the needs, knowledge, or implementation of osteopathic manipulative treatments (OMT) as a supportive care option in pediatric oncology. We hypothesized that pediatric oncology clinicians, caregivers, and patients have (a) limited knowledge of OMT and (b) dissatisfaction with current supportive care options and (c) would be interested in having OMT available during chemotherapy, once educated.

methodsParticipants included three cohorts: (1) children aged ≥ 9 years, diagnosed with cancer and actively receiving chemotherapy; (2) their caregivers; and (3) oncology clinicians at Nationwide Children's Hospital. Participants completed 1:1 semi-structured interviews, which were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for thematic content regarding their perception of supportive care measures and views on OMT. Quantitative data was summarized descriptively.

resultsA total of 60 participants completed the interview. Participants demonstrated limited awareness of osteopathic medicine; no participant had more than "some" knowledge of OMT. After education about OMT using a brief video, all clinicians, caregivers, and 95% of patients were receptive to OMT as a supportive care option. Major themes included the following: (a) patients have uncontrolled chemotherapy side effects, (b) improved supportive care options are desired, and (c) osteopathic medicine is a favorable supportive care adjunct.

conclusionsPediatric oncology clinicians, caregivers, and patients reported a need for better management of chemotherapy-associated side effects and an interest in utilizing OMT. These findings support further investigation into the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of implementing OMT in the pediatric oncology clinical setting.

Indexed as

CaregiversChildFemaleHumansMaleMedical OncologyOsteopathic MedicinePalliative CarePatientsPhysiciansIntegrative medicineOncologyOsteopathicPediatric

Identifiers

PMID32647995
PMCPMC7767897
OpenAlexW3040897350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.