Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32647898›Full record

ReviewPsychopharmacology2020

Rage Against the Machine: Advancing the study of aggression ethology via machine learning.

Nastacia L Goodwin, Simon R O Nilsson, Sam A Golden

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Neural circuits regulating prosocial behaviors.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Neurobiological Bases of Alcohol Consumption After Social Stress.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Neural circuit mechanisms that govern inter-male attack in mice.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Expressions of emotions across species.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nastacia L GoodwinDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Simon R O NilssonDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sam A GoldenDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. sagolden@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2104-2272

Funding

University of Washington Center of Excellence in Opioid Addiction ResearchP30DA048736 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Charles Chavkin · 2019 to 2026
$13.0M
Reimbursement request for attending the Meeting of the Jointly Sponsored Institutional Predoctoral Training in the Neurosciences T32 Program Directors in Baltimore, MD on 2/19/19T32NS099578 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SULLIVAN, JANE M, WONG, RACHEL O · 2016 to 2020
$1.4M
Connectomics of relapse to aggression seekingR00DA045662 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GOLDEN, SAM · 2019 to 2021
$736k
Brain and Behavior Research Foundation NARSAD Young Investigator Award 27082NIDA NIH HHS 4R00DA045662-02NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA048736NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA045662NIDA NIH HHS T32 5T32NS099578-04NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS099578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleAggression, comorbid with neuropsychiatric disorders, exhibits with diverse clinical presentations and places a significant burden on patients, caregivers, and society. This diversity is observed because aggression is a complex behavior that can be ethologically demarcated as either appetitive (rewarding) or reactive (defensive), each with its own behavioral characteristics, functionality, and neural basis that may transition from adaptive to maladaptive depending on genetic and environmental factors. There has been a recent surge in the development of preclinical animal models for studying appetitive aggression-related behaviors and identifying the neural mechanisms guiding their progression and expression. However, adoption of these procedures is often impeded by the arduous task of manually scoring complex social interactions. Manual observations are generally susceptible to observer drift, long analysis times, and poor inter-rater reliability, and are further incompatible with the sampling frequencies required of modern neuroscience methods.

objectivesIn this review, we discuss recent advances in the preclinical study of appetitive aggression in mice, paired with our perspective on the potential for machine learning techniques in producing automated, robust scoring of aggressive social behavior. We discuss critical considerations for implementing valid computer classifications within behavioral pharmacological studies. KEY

resultsOpen-source automated classification platforms can match or exceed the performance of human observers while removing the confounds of observer drift, bias, and inter-rater reliability. Furthermore, unsupervised approaches can identify previously uncharacterized aggression-related behavioral repertoires in model species. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsAdvances in open-source computational approaches hold promise for overcoming current manual annotation caveats while also introducing and generalizing computational neuroethology to the greater behavioral neuroscience community. We propose that currently available open-source approaches are sufficient for overcoming the main limitations preventing wide adoption of machine learning within the context of preclinical aggression behavioral research.

Indexed as

RewardAggressionAnimalsEthologyHumansMachine LearningMiceReproducibility of ResultsSocial BehaviorAggressionMachine learningMiceMotivationReward

Identifiers

PMID32647898
PMCPMC7502501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.