ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020
Exploring generative deep learning for omics data using log-linear models.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating discrepancies in dimensionality reduction for time-series single-cell RNA-sequencing data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Infusing structural assumptions into dimensionality reduction for single-cell RNA sequencing data to identify small gene sets.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Synthetic data generation methods in healthcare: A review on open-source tools and methods.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Rise of Deep Learning Clinical Applications and Challenges in Omics Data: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Interpretable generative deep learning: an illustration with single cell gene expression data.Human genetics · 2022Review
- Deep Learning-Based Intelligent Robot in Sentencing.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationFollowing many successful applications to image data, deep learning is now also increasingly considered for omics data. In particular, generative deep learning not only provides competitive prediction performance, but also allows for uncovering structure by generating synthetic samples. However, exploration and visualization is not as straightforward as with image applications.
resultsWe demonstrate how log-linear models, fitted to the generated, synthetic data can be used to extract patterns from omics data, learned by deep generative techniques. Specifically, interactions between latent representations learned by the approaches and generated synthetic data are used to determine sets of joint patterns. Distances of patterns with respect to the distribution of latent representations are then visualized in low-dimensional coordinate systems, e.g. for monitoring training progress. This is illustrated with simulated data and subsequently with cortical single-cell gene expression data. Using different kinds of deep generative techniques, specifically variational autoencoders and deep Boltzmann machines, the proposed approach highlights how the techniques uncover underlying structure. It facilitates the real-world use of such generative deep learning techniques to gain biological insights from omics data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code for the approach as well as an accompanying Jupyter notebook, which illustrates the application of our approach, is available via the GitHub repository: https://github.com/ssehztirom/Exploring-generative-deep-learning-for-omics-data-by-using-log-linear-models. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.