Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32647810›Full record

Observational studyOphthalmology. Glaucoma

Forecasting Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness from Multimodal Temporal Data Incorporating OCT Volumes.

Suman Sedai, Bhavna Antony, Hiroshi Ishikawa, Gadi Wollstein, Joel S Schuman, Rahil Garnavi

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Ophthalmology. Glaucoma. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Suman SedaiIBM Research-Australia, Melbourne, Australia.
Bhavna AntonyIBM Research-Australia, Melbourne, Australia.
Hiroshi IshikawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Health, NYU Eye Center, New York, New York.
Gadi WollsteinDepartment of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Health, NYU Eye Center, New York, New York.
Joel S SchumanDepartment of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Health, NYU Eye Center, New York, New York.
Rahil GarnaviIBM Research-Australia, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

Novel Glaucoma Diagnostics for Structure and Function - Renewal - 1R01EY013178 · NEI · WILLS EYE HEALTH SYSTEM · PI Joel S Schuman · 2000 to 2026
$17.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a machine learning model to forecast future circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cpRNFL) thickness in eyes of healthy, glaucoma suspect, and glaucoma participants from multimodal temporal data. Design: Retrospective analysis of a longitudinal clinical cohort. Participants: Longitudinal clinical cohort of healthy, glaucoma suspect, and glaucoma participants. Methods: The forecasting models used multimodal patient information including clinical (age and intraocular pressure), structural (cpRNFL thickness derived from scans as well as deep learning-derived OCT image features), and functional (visual field test parameters) data and the intervisit interval for prediction of cpRNFL thickness at the next visit. Four models were developed based on the number of visits used (n = 1 to 4). Longitudinal data from 1089 participants (mean observation period, 3.65±1.73 years) was used with 80% of the cohort for the development of the models. The results of our models were compared with those of a commonly adopted linear regression model, which we refer to here as Main Outcome Measures: The mean absolute difference and Pearson's correlation coefficient between the true and forecasted values of the cpRNFL in the healthy, glaucoma suspect, and glaucoma patients. Results: The best forecasting model of cpRNFL was obtained using 3 visits and incorporated deep learning-derived OCT image features. The mean error was 1.10±0.60 μm, 1.79±1.73 μm, and 1.87±1.85 μm in eyes of healthy, glaucoma suspect, and glaucoma participants, respectively. Our method significantly outperformed the LTBE model for glaucoma suspect and glaucoma participants ( Conclusions: The performance of the proposed forecasting model for cpRNFL is consistent across glaucoma suspect and glaucoma patients, which implies the robustness of the developed model against the disease state. These forecasted values may be useful to personalize patient care by determining the most appropriate intervisit schedule for timely interventions.

Indexed as

ForecastingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlaucomaHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedNerve FibersOptic DiskRetinal Ganglion CellsRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID32647810
PMCPMC7346776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.