Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32647749›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development

Learning to Speak Up for Patient Safety: Interprofessional Scenarios for Training Future Healthcare Professionals.

Lise McCoy, Joy H Lewis, Harvey Simon, Denise Sackett, Tala Dajani, Christine Morgan, Aaron Hunt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lise McCoyDepartment of Academic Affairs, College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York Institute of Technology, Jonesboro, AR, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4788-861X
Joy H LewisDepartment of Public Health, School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ, USA.
Harvey SimonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ, USA.
Denise SackettDepartment of Clinical Sciences, School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ, USA.
Tala DajaniDepartment of Clinical Sciences, School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2411-3360
Christine MorganDepartment of Graduate Medical Education, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ, USA.
Aaron HuntDepartment of Allied and Population Health, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreventable medical errors represent a leading cause of death in the United States. Effective undergraduate medical education (UME) strategies are needed to train medical students in error prevention, early identification of potential errors, and proactive communication. To address this need, a team of faculty from A.T. Still University's School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona developed four digital patient safety case scenarios for second-year medical students. These scenarios were designed to integrate interprofessional collaboration and patient safety principles, increase student ability to identify potential errors, and promote proactive communication skills.

methodsFaculty used Qualtrics to create four digital case scenarios on patient safety covering the following domains: communicating about potential drug-to-drug interactions; effective handoffs; human factors errors, such as fatigue, illness, and stress; and conflicts with supervising resident. In fall 2018, 97 second-year medical students completed the entire safety module in dyad or triad teams. As they worked through each case study, student teams completed 11 assessment questions with instant feedback, and participated in short case debrief discussions. Next, each individual student took a 12-question post-test to assess learning. Descriptive statistics were reviewed for the assessment questions, and case critical thinking discussion answers were reviewed to evaluate student comprehension.

resultsThe mean score for the module was 95.5% (SD= 6.36%, range = 75%-100%). Seventy-eight students completed the post-test, which had a mean score of 96.5% (SD = 6.51%, range = 66.7%-100%). Student written responses to the four case critical thinking discussion prompts indicated a high level of comprehension.

conclusionOur results demonstrated that digital case studies can provide an innovative mechanism to introduce key patient safety concepts and experiential practice of interprofessional communication in early UME. Our design and implementation of these engaging interprofessional patient safety training modules provided an opportunity for students to learn key communication and safety concepts in small teams. This training method was cost-effective and could be replicated in other online learning or blended learning environments for a wide range of health professions.

Indexed as

Interprofessional educationmedical educationmobile learningpatient safety

Identifiers

PMID32647749
PMCPMC7325460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.