Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32647735›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2020

Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Return to Sport Consensus Group.

Sean J Meredith, Thomas Rauer, Terese L Chmielewski, Christian Fink, Theresa Diermeier, Benjamin B Rothrauff, Eleonor Svantesson, Eric Hamrin Senorski, Timothy E Hewett, Seth L Sherman and 26 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. High variability and lack of standardization in the evaluation of return to sport after ACL reconstruction: a systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Return To Sport Following ACL Reconstruction.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Sean J MeredithInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Thomas RauerInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Terese L ChmielewskiInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Christian FinkInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Theresa DiermeierInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Benjamin B RothrauffInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Eleonor SvantessonInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Eric Hamrin SenorskiInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Timothy E HewettInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Seth L ShermanInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Bryson P LesniakInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Panther Symposium ACL Injury Return to Sport Consensus Group
Mario BizziniInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Shiyi ChenInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Moises CohenInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Stefano Della VillaInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Lars EngebretsenInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Hua FengInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mario FerrettiInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Freddie H FuInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Andreas B ImhoffInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Christopher C KaedingInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jon KarlssonInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ryosuke KurodaInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Andrew D LynchInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jacques MenetreyInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Volker MusahlInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ronald A NavarroInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Stephen J RabuckInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Rainer SieboldInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Lynn Snyder-MacklerInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Tim SpaldingInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Carola van EckInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Dharmesh VyasInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kate WebsterInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kevin WilkInvestigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA precise and consistent definition of return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is lacking, and there is controversy surrounding the process of returning patients to sport and their previous activity level. PURPOSE: The aim of the Panther Symposium ACL Injury Return to Sport Consensus Group was to provide a clear definition of RTS after ACL injury and a description of the RTS continuum as well as provide clinical guidance on RTS testing and decision-making. STUDY

designConsensus statement.

methodsAn international, multidisciplinary group of ACL experts convened as part of a consensus meeting. Consensus statements were developed using a modified Delphi method. Literature review was performed to report the supporting evidence.

resultsKey points include that RTS is characterized by achievement of the preinjury level of sport and involves a criteria-based progression from return to participation to RTS and, ultimately, return to performance. Purely time-based RTS decision-making should be abandoned. Progression occurs along an RTS continuum, with decision-making by a multidisciplinary group that incorporates objective physical examination data and validated and peer-reviewed RTS tests, which should involve functional assessment as well as psychological readiness. Consideration should be given to biological healing, contextual factors, and concomitant injuries.

conclusionThe resultant consensus statements and scientific rationale aim to inform the reader of the complex process of RTS after ACL injury that occurs along a dynamic continuum. Research is needed to determine the ideal RTS test battery, the best implementation of psychological readiness testing, and methods for the biological assessment of healing and recovery.

Indexed as

anterior cruciate ligamentrehabilitationreturn to sportsports medicine

Identifiers

PMID32647735
PMCPMC7328222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.