Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32647632›Full record

ArticleLiver cancer2020

How to Best Detect Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Meeting the Milan Criteria: Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI versus Contrast-Enhanced CT.

Jae Seok Bae, Jeong Min Lee, Jeong Hee Yoon, Siwon Jang, Jin Wook Chung, Kyung Bun Lee, Nam-Joon Yi, Jeong-Hoon Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jae Seok BaeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jeong Min LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jeong Hee YoonDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Siwon JangDepartment of Radiology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jin Wook ChungDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyung Bun LeeDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Nam-Joon YiDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jeong-Hoon LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seoul National University · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRSNUH SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe detection of portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) meeting the Milan criteria is of critical importance as PVTT is known to be a contraindication to transplantation and an indicator of a dismal prognosis.

objectiveTo determine which modality may best detect PVTT, we compared the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (GA-MRI) and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in HCC patients meeting the Milan criteria.

methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 310 patients with HCCs meeting the Milan criteria who underwent both GA-MRI and CECT between June 2007 and May 2017. Among them, 44 patients were demonstrated to have PVTT while 266 patients had no PVTT. Two radiologists then assessed GA-MRI and CECT images for the presence of PVTT on a 5-point scale as well as vessel expansion, continuity with tumors, and enhancement on both modalities, as well as T2 hyperintensity and diffusion restriction on GA-MRI. The McNemar test was used to compare sensitivity and specificity of GA-MRI and CECT for the detection of PVTT, and Fisher's exact test was used to compare their imaging features.

resultsGA-MRI showed higher sensitivity values than CECT in detecting PVTT (reviewer 1, 93.2% [41/44] vs. 77.3% [34/44]; reviewer 2, 88.6% [39/44] vs. 70.5% [31/44]) (both

conclusionGA-MRI detected PVTT more often than CECT in HCC patients meeting the Milan criteria and better depicted PVTT in continuity with tumors and those showing enhancement than CECT.

Indexed as

Contrast-enhanced CTGadoxetic acid-enhanced MRIHepatocellular carcinomaPortal vein thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID32647632
PMCPMC7325130
OpenAlexW3003505510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.