Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32647631›Full record

ArticleLiver cancer2020

Pretreatment Heterogeneous Enhancement Pattern of Hepatocellular Carcinoma May Be a Useful New Predictor of Early Response to Lenvatinib and Overall Prognosis.

Yusuke Kawamura, Masahiro Kobayashi, Junichi Shindoh, Yuta Kobayashi, Kayoko Kasuya, Tomoya Sano, Shunichiro Fujiyama, Tetsuya Hosaka, Satoshi Saitoh, Hitomi Sezaki and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluation and Prediction of Treatment Response for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yusuke KawamuraDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro KobayashiDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Junichi ShindohHepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuta KobayashiHepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kayoko KasuyaDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoya SanoDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shunichiro FujiyamaDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuya HosakaDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi SaitohDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hitomi SezakiDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Norio AkutaDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Fumitaka SuzukiDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiyuki SuzukiDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji IkedaDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuji AraseDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaji HashimotoHepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiromitsu KumadaDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Toranomon Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of pretreatment computed tomography (CT) enhancement of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as a potential predictor of response to lenvatinib and its relevance to survival outcomes.

methodsWe evaluated 51 consecutive patients who received lenvatinib treatment for unresectable HCC. On imaging analysis, pretreatment arterial/portal phase dynamic CT images were classified as follows: type 2, homogeneous enhancement pattern with increased arterial blood flow; type 3, heterogeneous enhancement pattern with a septum-like structure; and type 4, heterogeneous enhancement pattern with irregularly shaped ring structures. Treatment response was evaluated using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors at 2-12 weeks after initiation of lenvatinib, and the correlations between the CT enhancement patterns and response to lenvatinib or survival outcomes were investigated.

resultsOf the 51 patients, 38 (75%) experienced an objective response (OR). ORs were significantly more common in heterogeneously enhanced HCC (types 3 and 4) than in homogeneous HCC (type 2) (83 vs. 53%, respectively;

conclusionThe CT enhancement pattern of HCC may predict response to lenvatinib. OR seems to occur more frequently in HCC with oncologically aggressive features and may contribute to prolonged survival through a prolonged progression-free interval, even in an oncologically poor-risk group of patients.

Indexed as

Computed tomographyHepatocellular carcinomaLenvatinibMalignant potentialPoorly-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID32647631
PMCPMC7325131
OpenAlexW3004690490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.