Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32647625›Full record

ArticleIMA fungus2019

Chapter F of the

Tom W May, Scott A Redhead, Konstanze Bensch, David L Hawksworth, James Lendemer, Lorenzo Lombard, Nicholas J Turland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IMA fungus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Solving the Enigma of the Identity ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Rise up,Persoonia · 2025
    Article
  5. Powdery mildews onMycoscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The First Miniature, Small Foliose, BrownJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A review of recently introducedStudies in mycology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Fungal taxonomy: A puzzle with many missing piecesBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tom W MayRoyal Botanic Gardens Victoria, Birdwood Avenue, Melbourne, VIC 3004 Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2214-4972
Scott A RedheadOttawa Research and Development Centre, Science and Technology Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, K.W. Neatby Building, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6 Canada.
Konstanze BenschBotanische Staatssammlung München, Menzinger Str. 67, 80638 Munich, Germany.
David L HawksworthComparative Plant and Fungal Biology, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey TW9 3DS UK.
James LendemerInstitute of Systematic Botany, New York Botanical Garden, 2900 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, NY 10458-5126 USA.
Lorenzo LombardWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Uppsalalaan 8, Utrecht, CT 3584 The Netherlands.
Nicholas J TurlandBotanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Str. 6-8, 14195 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A revised version of

Indexed as

Editorial Committee for FungiGovernanceIdentifiersRepositoriesSanctioningSan Juan Chapter FShenzhen CodeTaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID32647625
PMCPMC7325661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.