Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32647621›Full record

ArticleIMA fungus2019

How to resolve cryptic species of polypores: an example in

Ursula Peintner, Regina Kuhnert-Finkernagel, Viana Wille, Franco Biasioli, Anton Shiryaev, Claudia Perini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IMA fungus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. TheIMA fungus · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Specific and Total COJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Revised taxon definition in EuropeanMycological progress · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Microorganisms · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. A Review ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ursula PeintnerUniversity Innsbruck, Institute of Microbiology, Technikerstr. 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5388-4266
Regina Kuhnert-FinkernagelUniversity Innsbruck, Institute of Microbiology, Technikerstr. 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Viana WilleUniversity Innsbruck, Institute of Microbiology, Technikerstr. 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Franco BiasioliFood Quality and Nutrition Department, Edmund Mach Foundation, Via Edmund Mach 1, 38010 San Michele all' Adige, Italy.
Anton ShiryaevVegetation & Mycobiota Diversity Department, Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology (IPAE), Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (UrB RAS), 8 March str., 202/3, 620144 Ekaterinburg, Russia.
Claudia PeriniDepartment of Life Sciences, University Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Universität Innsbruck · ATFondazione Edmund Mach · ITInstitute of Plant and Animal Ecology · RUUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species that cannot be easily distinguished based on morphology, but which form distinct phylogenetic lineages based on molecular markers, are often referred to as cryptic species. They have been proposed in a number of fungal genera, including the basidiomycete genus

Indexed as

ChemotaxonomyMorphological character evaluationMycelial growth ratesVolatile organic compoundsWood-degrading polypores

Identifiers

PMID32647621
PMCPMC7325651
OpenAlexW2980848395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.