Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32647331›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Involvement of Arabidopsis BIG protein in cell death mediated by Myo-inositol homeostasis.

Quentin Bruggeman, Florence Piron-Prunier, Frédérique Tellier, Jean-Denis Faure, David Latrasse, Deborah Manza-Mianza, Christelle Mazubert, Sylvie Citerne, Stéphanie Boutet-Mercey, Raphael Lugan and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Quentin BruggemanUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, INRAE, Univ Evry, Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay (IPS2), 91405, Orsay, France.
Florence Piron-PrunierUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, INRAE, Univ Evry, Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay (IPS2), 91405, Orsay, France.
Frédérique TellierInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78000, Versailles, France.
Jean-Denis FaureInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78000, Versailles, France.
David LatrasseUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, INRAE, Univ Evry, Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay (IPS2), 91405, Orsay, France.
Deborah Manza-MianzaUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, INRAE, Univ Evry, Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay (IPS2), 91405, Orsay, France.
Christelle MazubertUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, INRAE, Univ Evry, Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay (IPS2), 91405, Orsay, France.
Sylvie CiterneInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78000, Versailles, France.
Stéphanie Boutet-MerceyInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78000, Versailles, France.
Raphael LuganInstitut de Biologie Moléculaire Des Plantes, Unité Propre de Recherche 2357 CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, 12 rue du Général Zimmer, 67084, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Catherine BergouniouxUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, INRAE, Univ Evry, Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay (IPS2), 91405, Orsay, France.
Cécile RaynaudUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, INRAE, Univ Evry, Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay (IPS2), 91405, Orsay, France.
Moussa BenhamedUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, INRAE, Univ Evry, Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay (IPS2), 91405, Orsay, France.
Marianne DelarueUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, INRAE, Univ Evry, Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay (IPS2), 91405, Orsay, France. marianne.delarue@universite-paris-saclay.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Programmed cell death (PCD) is essential for several aspects of plant life. We previously identified the mips1 mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana, which is deficient for the enzyme catalysing myo-inositol synthesis, and that displays light-dependent formation of lesions on leaves due to Salicylic Acid (SA) over-accumulation. Rationale of this work was to identify novel regulators of plant PCD using a genetic approach. A screen for secondary mutations that abolish the mips1 PCD phenotype identified a mutation in the BIG gene, encoding a factor of unknown molecular function that was previously shown to play pleiotropic roles in plant development and defence. Physiological analyses showed that BIG is required for lesion formation in mips1 via SA-dependant signalling. big mutations partly rescued transcriptomic and metabolomics perturbations as stress-related phytohormones homeostasis. In addition, since loss of function of the ceramide synthase LOH2 was not able to abolish cell death induction in mips1, we show that PCD induction is not fully dependent of sphingolipid accumulation as previously suggested. Our results provide further insights into the role of the BIG protein in the control of MIPS1-dependent cell death and also into the impact of sphingolipid homeostasis in this pathway.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCalmodulin-Binding ProteinsCluster AnalysisEpistasis, GeneticHomeostasisInositolMutationPhenotypePlant Growth RegulatorsPlant LeavesSalicylic AcidSignal TransductionSphingolipidsArabidopsis ProteinsBIG protein, ArabidopsisCalmodulin-Binding ProteinsInositolPlant Growth RegulatorsSalicylic AcidSphingolipids

Identifiers

PMID32647331
PMCPMC7347573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.