Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32647293›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Analysis of tumor mutational burden: correlation of five large gene panels with whole exome sequencing.

Carina Heydt, Jan Rehker, Roberto Pappesch, Theresa Buhl, Markus Ball, Udo Siebolts, Anja Haak, Philipp Lohneis, Reinhard Büttner, Axel M Hillmer and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prevalence and Landscape of Actionable Genomic Alterations in Renal Cell Carcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carina Heydt *Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Jan Rehker *Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Roberto PappeschInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Theresa BuhlInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Markus BallInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Udo SieboltsInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany.
Anja HaakInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany.
Philipp LohneisInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Reinhard BüttnerInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Axel M HillmerInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Sabine Merkelbach-BruseInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. sabine.merkelbach-bruse@uk-koeln.de.
University of Cologne · DEUniversity Hospital in Halle · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outcome of immune checkpoint inhibition in cancer can be predicted by measuring PDL1 expression of tumor cells. Search for additional biomarkers led to tumor mutational burden (TMB) as surrogate marker for neoantigens presented. While TMB was previously determined via whole exome sequencing (WES), there have been approaches with comprehensive gene panels as well. We sequenced samples derived from formalin-fixed tumors, a POLE mutated cell line and standard DNA by WES and five different panels. If available, normal tissue was also exome sequenced. Sequencing data was analyzed by commercial software solutions and an in-house pipeline. A robust Pearson correlation (R = 0.9801 ± 0.0167; mean ± sd; N = 7) was determined for the different panels in a tumor paired normal setting for WES. Expanded analysis on tumor only exome sequenced samples yielded similar correlation (R = 0.9439 ± 0.0632; mean ± sd; N = 14). Remaining germline variants increased TMB in WES by 5.761 ± 1.953 (mean ± sd.; N = 7) variants per megabase (v/mb) for samples including synonymous variants and 3.883 ± 1.38 v/mb for samples without synonymous variants compared to tumor-normal paired calling results. Due to limited sample numbers in this study, additional replication is suggested for a clinical setting. Remaining germline variants in a tumor-only setting and artifacts caused by different library chemistries construction might affect the results.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorComputational BiologyDNA Mutational AnalysisDrug Resistance, NeoplasmExome SequencingGerm-Line MutationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansNeoplasmsAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID32647293
PMCPMC7347536
OpenAlexW3041893821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.