Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32647283›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Optimal cut-off values for anthropometric measures of obesity in screening for cardiometabolic disorders in adults.

Pawel Macek, Malgorzata Biskup, Malgorzata Terek-Derszniak, Halina Krol, Jolanta Smok-Kalwat, Stanislaw Gozdz, Marek Zak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: Risk assessment, physical activity, and management of complications.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists position paper-obesity in adults: a clinical primer.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. A New Approach Using BMI and FMI as Predictors of Cardio-Vascular Risk Factors among Mexican Young Adults.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pawel MacekInstitute of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, 25-317, Kielce, Poland.
Malgorzata BiskupInstitute of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, 25-317, Kielce, Poland.
Malgorzata Terek-DerszniakDepartment of Rehabilitation, Holycross Cancer Centre, 25-734, Kielce, Poland.
Halina KrolInstitute of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, 25-317, Kielce, Poland.
Jolanta Smok-KalwatClinical Oncology Clinic, Holycross Cancer Centre, 25-734, Kielce, Poland.
Stanislaw GozdzInstitute of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, 25-317, Kielce, Poland.
Marek ZakInstitute of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, 25-317, Kielce, Poland. mkzak@ujk.edu.pl.
Holy Cross University · PLJan Kochanowski University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excessive accumulation of body fat (BF) promotes obesity, whilst posing a significant health hazard. There being no agreed, optimal quantifying methods, application of BF variable in clinical practice is not deemed an effective assessment option. The study, involving 4,735 patients (33.6% men), aged 45-64, aimed to identify optimal cut-off values for anthropometric indicators of obesity to evaluate cardiometabolic risk. A minimum P-value approach was applied to calculate the cut-offs for BF%. Threshold values for body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and waist-to-height (WHTR) ratio, facilitating optimal differentiation of cardiometabolic risk, were based on BF%, expressed as a binary classifier. The newly estimated cut-off values for predicting cardiometabolic risk, based on BMI, were lower than the referential obesity thresholds, whereas the threshold values of WC, WHR, and WHTR were higher. Apart from dyslipidemia, the odds of cardiometabolic disorders were higher, when the anthropometric indicators under study exceeded the cut-off points in both sexes. The proposed cut-offs proved instrumental in predicting cardiometabolic risk, whilst highlighting diagnostic and clinical potential of BF%, whereas BMI boasted the highest predictive potential. Cardiometabolic risk also proved significantly higher even in the overweight patients.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsAnthropometryArea Under CurveBody Mass IndexCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayObesityOdds RatioPolandRiskROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID32647283
PMCPMC7347554
OpenAlexW3040859865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.