Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32647238›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Exploring bacteria diversity in commercialized table olive biofilms by metataxonomic and compositional data analysis.

Antonio Benítez-Cabello, Verónica Romero-Gil, Eduardo Medina-Pradas, Antonio Garrido-Fernández, Francisco Noé Arroyo-López

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Novel methods of microbiome analysis in the food industry.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Antonio Benítez-CabelloFood Technology Department, Instituto de La Grasa (CSIC), Crta Utrera km 1, Campus Universitario Pablo de Olavide. Building 46, 41013, Seville, Spain.
Verónica Romero-GilTechnological Applications for Improvement of Quality and Safety in Foods, Carretera de Marbella nº22. Planta-1, 29108, Guaro, Málaga, Spain.
Eduardo Medina-PradasFood Technology Department, Instituto de La Grasa (CSIC), Crta Utrera km 1, Campus Universitario Pablo de Olavide. Building 46, 41013, Seville, Spain.
Antonio Garrido-FernándezFood Technology Department, Instituto de La Grasa (CSIC), Crta Utrera km 1, Campus Universitario Pablo de Olavide. Building 46, 41013, Seville, Spain.
Francisco Noé Arroyo-LópezFood Technology Department, Instituto de La Grasa (CSIC), Crta Utrera km 1, Campus Universitario Pablo de Olavide. Building 46, 41013, Seville, Spain. fnoe@ig.csic.es.
Instituto de la Grasa · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, a total of 72 samples of non-thermally treated commercial table olives were obtained from different markets of the world. Then, prokaryotic diversity in olive biofilms was investigated by metataxonomic analysis. A total of 660 different OTUs were obtained, belonging to Archaea (2.12%) and Bacteria domains (97.88%). From these, 41 OTUs with a proportion of sequences ≥ 0.01% were studied by compositional data analysis. Only two genera were found in all samples, Lactobacillus, which was the predominant bacteria in the biofilm consortium (median 54.99%), and Pediococcus (26.09%). Celerinatantimonas, Leuconostoc, Alkalibacterium, Pseudomonas, Marinilactibacillus, Weissella, and the family Enterobacteriaceae were also present in at least 80% of samples. Regarding foodborne pathogens, only Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrio, and Staphylococcus were detected in at least 91.66%, 75.00%, and 54.10% of samples, respectively, but their median values were always below 0.15%. Compositional data analysis allowed discriminating between lye treated and natural olive samples, as well as between olives packaged in glass, PET and plastic bags. Leuconostoc, Celerinatantimonas, and Alkalibacterium were the bacteria genera with a higher discriminant power among samples. These results expand our knowledge of the bacteria diversity in olive biofilms, providing information about the sanitary and hygienic status of this ready-to-eat fermented vegetable.

Indexed as

BiofilmsMicrobiotaArchaeaBacteriaDNA, ArchaealDNA, BacterialFermented FoodsFood MicrobiologyFood PackagingFruitOleaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, ArchaealDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID32647238
PMCPMC7347591
OpenAlexW3041681098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.