Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32647162›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Shoot organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis from leaf and root explants of Scaevola sericea.

Hanzhi Liang, Yuping Xiong, Beiyi Guo, Haifeng Yan, Shuguang Jian, Hai Ren, Xinhua Zhang, Yuan Li, Songjun Zeng, Kunlin Wu and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Application ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hanzhi LiangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany and Engineering Laboratory for Vegetation Ecosystem Restoration On Islands and Coastal Zones, South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Yuping XiongGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany and Engineering Laboratory for Vegetation Ecosystem Restoration On Islands and Coastal Zones, South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Beiyi GuoGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany and Engineering Laboratory for Vegetation Ecosystem Restoration On Islands and Coastal Zones, South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Haifeng YanCash Crop Institute of Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, China.
Shuguang JianGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany and Engineering Laboratory for Vegetation Ecosystem Restoration On Islands and Coastal Zones, South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Hai RenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany and Engineering Laboratory for Vegetation Ecosystem Restoration On Islands and Coastal Zones, South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Xinhua ZhangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany and Engineering Laboratory for Vegetation Ecosystem Restoration On Islands and Coastal Zones, South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Yuan LiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany and Engineering Laboratory for Vegetation Ecosystem Restoration On Islands and Coastal Zones, South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Songjun ZengGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany and Engineering Laboratory for Vegetation Ecosystem Restoration On Islands and Coastal Zones, South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Kunlin WuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany and Engineering Laboratory for Vegetation Ecosystem Restoration On Islands and Coastal Zones, South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Feng ZhengGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany and Engineering Laboratory for Vegetation Ecosystem Restoration On Islands and Coastal Zones, South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Jaime A Teixeira da SilvaMiki-cho Post Office, P.O. Box 7, Ikenobe 3011-2, Miki-cho, Kagawa-ken, 761-0799, Japan. jaimetex@yahoo.com.
Youhua XiongCollege of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, 510225, China. youhuachina@126.com.
Guohua MaGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany and Engineering Laboratory for Vegetation Ecosystem Restoration On Islands and Coastal Zones, South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China. magh@scib.ac.cn.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNSouth China Botanical Garden · CNUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNGuangxi Academy of Agricultural Science · CNZhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An efficient regeneration system via shoot organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis from in vitro leaf and root explants was established for Scaevola sericea for the first time. The highest axillary shoot proliferation coefficient (4.8) was obtained on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 1.0 mg/L 6-benzyladenine (BA) and 0.1 mg/L α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) every 45 days. Young in vitro leaves and roots, which were used as explants, were cultured onto medium supplemented with different plant growth regulators. Our results showed that only cytokinins BA and thidiazuron (TDZ), could induce adventitious shoots and somatic embryos from leaf and root explants. The optimal medium to achieve this was MS medium supplemented with 2.5 mg/L BA and which induced most adventitious shoots (2.7) and somatic embryos (17.3) from leaf explants within 30 days. From root explants, 1.1 adventitious shoots and 7.6 somatic embryos could be induced on MS medium supplemented with 2.5 mg/L TDZ. Histological observation showed that both somatic embryos and adventitious shoots were originated from homogeneous parenchyma and the development of somatic embryos was visible. Maximum rooting percentage (99.0%) was achieved on half-strength MS medium supplemented with 2.5 mg/L NAA. Well-rooted plantlets, which were transplanted into a substrate of pure river sand, displayed a high survival percentage of 91.7% after transplanting for 45 days while the best substrate for plantlet growth was river sand: coral sand (1:1).

Indexed as

Plant Somatic Embryogenesis TechniquesAsteraceaeCulture MediaPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant LeavesPlant RootsPlant ShootsCulture MediaPlant Growth Regulators

Identifiers

PMID32647162
PMCPMC7347615
OpenAlexW3041013163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.