ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020
A Clinical Application Study of Mixed Reality Technology Assisted Lumbar Pedicle Screws Implantation.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of rehabilitation outcomes between robot-assisted and freehand screw placement in treatment of femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Augmented Reality in Navigated Surgery: A Systematic Review of Clinical Accuracy and System Performance.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Review
- Mixed Reality for Localisation of Rib Fractures Before Surgical Stabilization: A Pilot Study of an Innovative Tool.Surgical innovation · 2026Article
- Orthopedic surgery assisted by mixed reality technology: systematic review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Research progress on the application of mixed reality technology in femoral tunnel positioning during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Intraoperative use of mixed reality (MR) in humans across surgical disciplines: a major review.3D printing in medicine · 2025Article
- Robot-assisted versus conventional percutaneous screw fixation in calcaneal fractures: a retrospective analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Review
- Usefulness of Mixed Reality in Surgical Treatment: Delphi Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- The Clinical Impact of Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation on Pedicle Screw Placement and its Effect on Perioperative Outcomes: A Systematic Review.Spine surgery and related research · 2025Review
- A Network Meta-Analysis Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Pedicle Screw Placement Techniques Using Intraoperative Conventional, Navigation, Robot-Assisted, and Augmented Reality Guiding Systems.International journal of spine surgery · 2024Article
- Advances in imaging modalities for spinal tumors.Neuro-oncology advances · 2024Review
- Article
- Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality Applications for Surgical Rehearsal, Operative Execution, and Patient Education in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Assessing the Accuracy of Spinal Instrumentation Using Augmented Reality (AR): A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Mixed Reality in Modern Surgical and Interventional Practice: Narrative Review of the Literature.JMIR serious games · 2023Review
- Current and Emerging Approaches for Spine Tumor Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Spine Surgery Assisted by Augmented Reality: Where Have We Been?Yonsei medical journal · 2022Review
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: An Overview.Current medical science · 2021Review
- Mixed reality for visualization of orthopedic surgical anatomy.World journal of orthopedics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This was a prospective comparative study of mixed reality (MR) technology assisted lumbar pedicle screws placement and traditional lumbar pedicle screws placement. MATERIAL AND METHODS Fifty cases of lumbar pedicle screws placement were randomly divided into 2 groups: 25 cases with MR technology in group A, and 25 cases without MR technology in group B. All patients had their scores on the Oswestry disability index (ODI) of low back pain and the visual analog scale (VAS) of the affected lower limb recorded at pre-operation. Blood loss, operative duration, success rate of first penetration by tap, and number of times C-arm fluoroscopy was performed were recorded at intraoperation. The postoperative drainage was recorded. The ODI of low back pain and VAS of the affected lower limb were recorded at 1, 3, and 6 months after operation. RESULTS Group A had less bleeding, shorter operation time, higher success rate of first penetration by tap, and fewer times using C-arm fluoroscopy at intraoperation (P<0.05). There was significant difference in ODI scores and VAS scores at 1 mouth after operation (P<0.05). The postoperative drainage of group A was less than group B (P<0.05). The implantation accuracy of group A was higher than group B (P<0.05). The postoperative recovery rate of low back pain of group A was faster than group B (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The safety of spinal surgery and implantation accuracy of pedicle screw fixation system could be increased by MR technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.