ArticlePhysiological measurement2020
Artifact rejection and missing data imputation in cerebral blood flow velocity signals via trace norm minimization.
Article in Physiological measurement, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMany physiological signals are degraded by significant corruptions that limit their usefulness. One example is cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) signals, measured by transcranial Doppler, which are susceptible to large errors from patient motion. In this paper, we propose a method to remove artifacts and impute sections of missing data in these signals. APPROACH: The method exploits the low-order dynamical relationship between CBFV, arterial blood pressure and, where available, intracranial pressure. It enhances the measured signals by fitting them to a low-order dynamical model, using convex regularization terms that improve robustness to large deviations and missing data. The method is based on a convex optimization formulation and utilizes recent work in trace norm approximation and subspace system identification. MAIN
resultsSimulations demonstrate that the method successfully removes real CBFV artifacts and can impute missing data with reasonable accuracy. Performance was improved when intracranial pressure data was available.
conclusionThe methods presented can be used by researchers to remove artifacts and estimate missing sections in CBFV signals. The general approach may be applied to other biomedical signal processing settings. SIGNIFICANCE: This low-order dynamical approach has ongoing applications in noninvasive intracranial pressure estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.