Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32647058›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Adaptation of plasticity to projected maximum temperatures and across climatically defined bioregions.

Jonathan Sandoval-Castillo, Katie Gates, Chris J Brauer, Steve Smith, Louis Bernatchez, Luciano B Beheregaray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Marine life science & technology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonathan Sandoval-CastilloMolecular Ecology Lab, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8428-3495
Katie GatesMolecular Ecology Lab, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3410-7909
Chris J BrauerMolecular Ecology Lab, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.
Steve SmithMolecular Ecology Lab, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1318-0018
Louis BernatchezInstitut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8085-9709
Luciano B BeheregarayMolecular Ecology Lab, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia; luciano.beheregaray@flinders.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-0944-3003

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resilience to environmental stressors due to climate warming is influenced by local adaptations, including plastic responses. The recent literature has focused on genomic signatures of climatic adaptation, but little is known about how plastic capacity may be influenced by biogeographic and evolutionary processes. We investigate phenotypic plasticity as a target of climatic selection, hypothesizing that lineages that evolved in warmer climates will exhibit greater plastic adaptive resilience to upper thermal stress. This was experimentally tested by comparing transcriptomic responses within and among temperate, subtropical, and desert ecotypes of Australian rainbowfish subjected to contemporary and projected summer temperatures. Critical thermal maxima were estimated, and ecological niches delineated using bioclimatic modeling. A comparative phylogenetic expression variance and evolution model was used to assess plastic and evolved changes in gene expression. Although 82% of all expressed genes were found in the three ecotypes, they shared expression patterns in only 5 out of 236 genes that responded to the climate change experiment. A total of 532 genes showed signals of adaptive (i.e., genetic-based) plasticity due to ecotype-specific directional selection, and 23 of those responded to projected summer temperatures. Network analyses demonstrated centrality of these genes in thermal response pathways. The greatest adaptive resilience to upper thermal stress was shown by the subtropical ecotype, followed by the desert and temperate ecotypes. Our findings indicate that vulnerability to climate change will be highly influenced by biogeographic factors, emphasizing the value of integrative assessments of climatic adaptive traits for accurate estimation of population and ecosystem responses.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEcosystemHot TemperatureAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsAustraliaDesert ClimateEcotypeFishesGenomicsTranscriptomeclimate changeclimatic variability hypothesisecological genomicsteleoststhermal biology

Identifiers

PMID32647058
PMCPMC7382230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.