Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32647057›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Mechanistic determinants of effector-independent motor memory encoding.

Adarsh Kumar, Gaurav Panthi, Rechu Divakar, Pratik K Mutha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Evidence for an effector-independent action system from people born without hands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adarsh KumarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382355, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6485-7869
Gaurav PanthiCenter for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382355, India.
Rechu DivakarCenter for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382355, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2014-6141
Pratik K MuthaCenter for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382355, India; pm@iitgn.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coordinated, purposeful movements learned with one effector generalize to another effector, a finding that has important implications for tool use, sports, performing arts, and rehabilitation. This occurs because the motor memory acquired through learning comprises representations that are effector-independent. Despite knowing this for decades, the neural mechanisms and substrates that are causally associated with the encoding of effector-independent motor memories remain poorly understood. Here we exploit intereffector generalization, the behavioral signature of effector-independent representations, to address this crucial gap. We first show in healthy human participants that postlearning generalization across effectors is principally predicted by the level of an implicit mechanism that evolves gradually during learning to produce a temporally stable memory. We then demonstrate that interfering with left but not right posterior parietal cortex (PPC) using high-definition cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation impedes learning mediated by this mechanism, thus potentially preventing the encoding of effector-independent memory components. We confirm this in our final experiment in which we show that disrupting left PPC but not primary motor cortex after learning has been allowed to occur blocks intereffector generalization. Collectively, our results reveal the key mechanism that encodes an effector-independent memory trace and uncover a central role for the PPC in its representation. The encoding of such motor memory components outside primary sensorimotor regions likely underlies a parsimonious neural organization that enables more efficient movement planning in the brain, independent of the effector used to act.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrain MappingComputational BiologyFemaleHumansLearningMaleMemoryMotor CortexMovementParietal LobeTranscranial Direct Current StimulationYoung Adultgeneralizationlearningmovementposterior parietal cortex

Identifiers

PMID32647057
PMCPMC7382293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.