Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32647024›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Understanding key mechanisms of successfully leading integrated team-based services in health and social care: protocol for a realist synthesis.

Ruth Harris, Simon Fletcher, Sarah Sims, Fiona Ross, Sally Brearley, Jill Manthorpe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruth HarrisFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK ruth.harris@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4377-5063
Simon FletcherFaculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Sarah SimsFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.
Fiona RossFaculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Sally BrearleyFaculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Jill ManthorpeNIHR Health & Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 18/01/06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs systems of health and social care in England move towards more integrated and collaborative models, leaders will need different skills than their predecessors to enable system leadership, building partnerships and working across organisations and sectors. There is little understanding of what the mechanisms for effective leadership across integrated health and social care systems might be, the contexts that influence good leadership, or the nature of the resulting outcomes. This review aims to identify, refine and test programme theories of leadership of integrated team-based services in health and social care, exploring what works, for whom and in what circumstances. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study uses a realist synthesis approach, following RAMESES guidelines, supported by stakeholder consultation. Stage 1 will develop initial programme theories about leadership of integrated health and social care based on a review of the scientific and grey literature and a stakeholder consultation workshop. Stage 2 will involve focused searching of empirical literature, data extraction and synthesis to refine the initial programme theories and identify relationships between identified contexts, mechanisms and outcomes. A second stakeholder event will guide the focus of the review. Stage 3 will further refine and interrogate the theories testing them against substantive theory on leadership of complex systems and through the experiences and expertise of the stakeholder group. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Our study does not require ethics committee approval. This research will contribute to building an in-depth understanding of what aspects of leadership of integrated team-based services work, for whom and in what circumstances. It will identify the professional development needs of leaders and provide recommendations about optimal organisational and interorganisational structures and processes that support effective leadership in integrated health and social care systems. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications, conference presentations and formal and informal reports. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018119291.

Indexed as

LeadershipReferral and ConsultationEnglandReview Literature as TopicSocial Supporthealth policyhealth services administration & managementhuman resource managementorganisational developmentorganisation of health services

Identifiers

PMID32647024
PMCPMC7351270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.